2013
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/3/035007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization and parameter estimation for seminorm regularization models with I -divergence constraints

Abstract: In this papers we analyze the minimization of seminorms L · on R n under the constraint of a bounded I-divergence D(b, H·) for rather general linear operators H and L. The I-divergence is also known as Kullback-Leibler divergence and appears in many models in imaging science, in particular when dealing with Poisson data. Often H represents, e.g., a linear blur operator and L is some discrete derivative or frame analysis operator. We prove relations between the the parameters of I-divergence constrained and pen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various strategies were proposed in order to address the first question [26,27,28,29,30], but the computational cost of these methods is often high, especially when several regularization parameters have to be set. Alternatively, it has been recognized for a long time that incorporating constraints directly on the solutions [31,32,33,34,35] instead of considering regularized functions may often facilitate the choice of the involved parameters. Indeed, in a constrained formulation, the constraint bounds are usually related to some physical properties of the target solution or some knowledge of the degradation process, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various strategies were proposed in order to address the first question [26,27,28,29,30], but the computational cost of these methods is often high, especially when several regularization parameters have to be set. Alternatively, it has been recognized for a long time that incorporating constraints directly on the solutions [31,32,33,34,35] instead of considering regularized functions may often facilitate the choice of the involved parameters. Indeed, in a constrained formulation, the constraint bounds are usually related to some physical properties of the target solution or some knowledge of the degradation process, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical Total Variation objective function [20] is obtained, as a special case, when Φ is an ℓ 2,1 norm and L corresponds to a discrete gradient operator. Constrained models based on the I-divergence have been considered in [5,22], where in the second paper special attention was paid to the relation between the parameters of the constrained and the penalized problem via discrepancy principles. Note that recently penalized versus constrained problems in a rather general form were handled in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a formulation may be preferred to a regularized one since it has been recognized for a long time that incorporating constraints directly on the solution often facilitates the choice of the involved parameters [1,2,3,4,5]. Indeed, the constraint bounds are usually related to some physical properties of the target solution or to some knowledge of the degradation process, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%