1980
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176344953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimax Estimation of Location Parameters for Spherically Symmetric Distributions with Concave Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown [7] proved that the best invariant estimator of a location vector is inadmissible for a wide class of distributions and loss functions if the dimension is at least three. James and Stein's [13] result remains true if the distribution of X is spherically symmetric and p 4 as shown by Brandwein [2], Brandwein and Strawderman [3,4,6], Fan and Fang [11] and others; see the review article by Brandwein and Strawderman [5]. Under the assumption that the components of X are independent, identically and symmetrically (iis) distributed about their respective means, Shinozaki [15] investigated the bounds of a and b in (1) which involve the second and the fourth moments of the component distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Brown [7] proved that the best invariant estimator of a location vector is inadmissible for a wide class of distributions and loss functions if the dimension is at least three. James and Stein's [13] result remains true if the distribution of X is spherically symmetric and p 4 as shown by Brandwein [2], Brandwein and Strawderman [3,4,6], Fan and Fang [11] and others; see the review article by Brandwein and Strawderman [5]. Under the assumption that the components of X are independent, identically and symmetrically (iis) distributed about their respective means, Shinozaki [15] investigated the bounds of a and b in (1) which involve the second and the fourth moments of the component distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…c 2 1 dx (2) . From (7), one sees that d c (i)ÂV(c) is positive, continuous for c # (0, 1] and Without loss of generality, we assume q 2 =q 3 .…”
Section: Main Results and The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (7), one sees that d c (i)ÂV(c) is positive, continuous for c # (0, 1] and Without loss of generality, we assume q 2 =q 3 . Define $ 2 (X (2) )= (1&1Âb(a+|X (2) | 2 )) X (2) . By Lemma 4 in Brown and Hwang (1989), there exists a constant K>0 independent of c such that 2#E(W c (X (2) &% (2) )&W c ($ 2 (X (2) )&% (2) To prove Theorem 2, we partition % and X as universally dominates X (2) under [W n c ( } ), c>0].…”
Section: Main Results and The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Brandwein and Strawderman [2] and the papers in their references. Shinozaki [6] obtained similar results in the case where XL, X~,..., Xp are independent, identically and symmetrically distributed p random variables, by applying integration by parts to three typical distributions; uniform, double exponential and t. Since Stein [8] used integration by parts for estimating the location parameter of the normal distribution, it has been shown to apply to simultaneous estimation problems in general continuous exponential family by many authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berger [1] showed some results for losses which are polynomial in the coordinates of (8-#) for the normal case, and Brandwein and Strawderman [2] for the spherically symmetric distribution when the loss is a nondecreasing concave function of quadratic loss. Here we also study a special form of Berger's loss function for the uniform distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%