2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery in patients at high risk

Abstract: The heart-port-based minimally invasive approach seems to be safe, feasible, and reproducible in case of tricuspid valve operations. It ensures low perioperative morbidity, moderate to low rates of tricuspid regurgitation recurrence, and low late mortality. It also seems to have an added value in case of reoperative procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LIMVS technique has been previously described [17][18][19]. A double lumen endotracheal tube or a bronchus blocker was positioned to allow one-lung ventilation.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LIMVS technique has been previously described [17][18][19]. A double lumen endotracheal tube or a bronchus blocker was positioned to allow one-lung ventilation.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right minithoracotomy techniques used in our department have been previously described [7,8]. Double lumen endotracheal tube was positioned to allow 1-lung ventilation and bilateral radial arterial lines was used for monitoring blood pressure.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CþEB cannulation with antegrade perfusion has several advantages over the peripheral approach. It allows the avoidance of the risk of groin wound infection, wound seroma, and femoral artery injury and to reduce the risk of aortic dissection and atheroembolism with neurological injury caused by RAP and retrograde balloon manipulation [8,12,20]. In addition, it should also provide a better stability of the endoclamp and a lower risk of balloon migration with innominate artery occlusion [20].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tricuspid valvular disease has been always considered less clinically important than mitral and aortic valves pathology, and its optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial [1]. Many patients undergo concomitant tricuspid valve surgery at the time of mitral or aortic valve intervention, while isolated tricuspid valve surgery is rarely performed [2]. However, there are a large population of secondary isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation after previous cardiac operations, they are neglected and undertreated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%