2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive surgery for abdominal and thoracic neuroblastic tumors: A systematic review by the APSA Cancer committee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complications of laparoscopic surgery of neurogenic tumors mainly include intraoperative bleeding, conversion to laparotomy, renal atrophy or renal infarction, diaphragm injury and intestinal obstruction ( 3-5 ). There has been no reports of tumor recurrence at the puncture site of Trocar after laparoscopic neurogenic tumor resection ( 6 ). Leclair et al ( 7 ) report that laparoscopic minimally invasive technology is suitable for children with complete tumor capsule and negative image-defined risk factors (IDRFs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications of laparoscopic surgery of neurogenic tumors mainly include intraoperative bleeding, conversion to laparotomy, renal atrophy or renal infarction, diaphragm injury and intestinal obstruction ( 3-5 ). There has been no reports of tumor recurrence at the puncture site of Trocar after laparoscopic neurogenic tumor resection ( 6 ). Leclair et al ( 7 ) report that laparoscopic minimally invasive technology is suitable for children with complete tumor capsule and negative image-defined risk factors (IDRFs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no clear recommendation regarding the tumor size, for adrenal masses in children, the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) recommends a maximum size of 6 cm in their guidelines 5 . In a systematic review or retrospective review of MIS for pediatric solid abdominal tumor, the maximum tumor diameter was 7–8 cm 3,6 . In addition, there are few case reports of the MIS approach for pediatric solid tumors larger than 10 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In a systematic review or retrospective review of MIS for pediatric solid abdominal tumor, the maximum tumor diameter was 7-8 cm. 3,6 In addition, there are few case reports of the MIS approach for pediatric solid tumors larger than 10 cm. In our case, the tumor was huge with a maximum diameter of 13 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-operative diagnostic workup and identification of IDRFs obtained by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance are essential to precisely localize the lesion and identify the extent of the disease. A recent systematic review conducted by the APSA Cancer Committee confirmed how a pre-operative objective assessment by IDRFs and size criteria are recommended to guide the approach, in order to follow oncologic principles of surgical resection of neuroblastic tumors with the least possible morbidity (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%