1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70410-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive port-access coronary artery bypass grafting with early angiographic follow-up: Initial clinical experience

Abstract: These results demonstrate that Port-Access coronary artery bypass can be performed accurately and safely with acceptable morbidity. This approach allows for multivessel revascularization on an arrested, protected heart with excellent anastomotic precision and reproducible early graft patency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ribikove [6] reported the first angiographic data in 1997. Pre-discharge angiograms were completed in 37 patients undergoing primary CABG.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ribikove [6] reported the first angiographic data in 1997. Pre-discharge angiograms were completed in 37 patients undergoing primary CABG.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 month 28 Ribakove et al [6] 100% LIMA-LAD Before discharge 27 98% overall Barlow et al [14] 100% LIMA-LAD 12 weeks 10 Vigano et al [15] 97.6% Postoperative 20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,4,5 In the Heartport system, aortic clamping is performed by the Endo Aortic Clamp (EAC) balloon catheter. The EAC balloon catheter in the Heartport system is inserted into the aorta via an artery in the lower limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] These are collectively called minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), in which minimal skin incisions are made. The advantages of these techniques are less invasiveness to the patient, faster postoperative recovery, and a shorter hospital stay than in conventional cardiac surgery, all of which should contribute to improved patient care and a reduced financial burden.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Reports confirmed the safety and efficacy of this approach in valvular surgery [8, 9] as well as coronary artery bypass operations [10, 11]. Comparison with median sternotomy demonstrated reductions in both postoperative length of stay and direct hospital costs [12, 13].…”
Section: The Development Of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgerymentioning
confidence: 95%