Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary
                        Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary
                        Surgery?

Objectives Minimally invasive CABG is making positive strides in the evolution of coronary artery bypass surgery. We carried out a retrospective study of the efficacy and outcomes of the usage of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in MICS CABG patients over a 6 year period using primary (MACCE) and secondary outcome measures and also carried out a subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes and methodology of revascularization, and with analogy to the SYNTAX trial of the relative risk. Methods Nine hundred and forty patients underwent multivessel MICS CABG via a left mini-thoracotomy from August 2011 to September 2017 and complete revascularization was done using the left internal thoracic artery–right internal thoracic artery Y (LITA–RITA Y) composite conduit. Efficacy and outcomes were evaluated by primary (MACCE) and secondary outcome measures including total length of stay, return to full physical activity, and quality of life. Propensity score matched analyses were carried out in diabetics, in the methodology of revascularization (MICS OPCABG vs. MICS ONCABG), and by comparison to the SYNTAX trial for relative risk. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years (maximum was 5.6 years). Results Out of the 940 patients, 843 (89.6%) were diabetic and 97 (10.4%) were nondiabetic. Average grafts were 3.2. There were 9 mortalities (0.9%). The average ICU and hospital stay was 40 ± 12 hours and 3.1 days. Ten patients (1.06%) required reintervention by angioplasty. A total of 99.3% patients were free from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at follow-up. Mean follow-up was 33 months and 846 (90%) of the patients were followed up. Based on propensity score–matched groups, patients who had their surgery done by MICS ONCABG (beating heart technique) had greater mean number of grafts and hospital length of stay and had significantly longer ICU stay, extubation in OR and blood loss in comparison to patients who had their CABG done by the MICS OPCABG technique. The new technique has shown favorable risk reduction in comparison to both the arms of the SYNTAX trial. Conclusions The safety, efficacy and outcomes of minimally invasive CABG evaluated by primary (MACCE) and secondary outcomes and quality-of-life measures have been good in this study, especially in diabetics, and have shown results better than conventional CABG. The learning curve can be safely negotiated by using peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass assistance and comparison with the SYNTAX trial has shown a relative reduction in all-cause risk.

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 43%

Outcomes of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Analogy to the SYNTAX Trial

Nambiar

Kumar

Mittal

et al. 2019

“…However, limited incisions are being increasingly used in minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery revascularizations. [1][2][3][4][5] Despite the advantages in the patient's recovery, the main limitations of these minimally invasive coronary artery revascularization techniques had been the technical difficulties, longevity of the procedures, complex technology, long learning curve, and selection of patients. [6][7][8][9] Since July 2017 we started to perform multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) routinely through the left anterior minithoracotomy in all patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Complete Coronary Revascularization via Left Anterior Thoracotomy

Babliak¹,

Demianenko²,

Melnyk³

et al. 2019

Objective Our aim was to develop the minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) technique, which is equally effective and safe compared with conventional coronary grafting technique, is reproducible, and can be applied in the vast majority of patients with isolated coronary artery disease. Methods From July 2017 to November 2018 a total of 170 nonselected consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive on-pump multivessel CABG through the left anterior minithoracotomy in the fourth intercostal space using a Chitwood clamp and blood cardioplegia. We named this technique total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy. The mean number of grafts was 3.1 ± 0.7. Left internal mammary artery was used in 159 (93.5%) patients, right internal mammary artery in 4 (2.4%) patients, radial artery in 25 (14.7%) patients, and veins in 148 (87%) patients. Results We had no mortality, no postoperative myocardial infarcts, and no conversion to sternotomy. There were 2 postoperative strokes without residual neurological deficit and 2 revisions for postoperative bleeding. The total operation time was 258.8 ± 43.9 minutes, cardiopulmonary bypass time 135.8 ± 26.6 minutes, and aortic cross-clamp time 71.2 ± 19.4 minutes. The mean intensive care stay was 2.1 ± 0.56 days and mean total hospital stay 6.3 ± 1.3 days. Conclusions Complete coronary revascularization could be routinely performed using the above-mentioned technique. No patient selection, based on number of grafts, quality and location of coronary vessels, left ventricle function, age, gender, or body mass index, is required.

“…Reduced pulmonary function may not seem ideal for a thoracotomy approach, but other studies have shown a trend favoring thoracotomy over sternotomy. [11][12][13] We found an improvement in pulmonary function testing during immediate and late postoperative periods. 14 Other collogues have outlines bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting and outcomes from MICS CABG approach for arterial conduits.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Evolution of Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Andrawes

Shariff

Nabagiez

et al. 2018

Objective Minimally invasive coronary surgery approach for coronary artery bypass grafting is a safe and reproducible procedure for multivessel revascularization. This study reviewed a single surgeon's experience with minimally invasive coronary surgery coronary artery bypass grafting, including operative time, number of bypasses, and conversion to sternotomy. Methods A prospective database of consecutive minimally invasive coronary surgery coronary artery bypass grafting procedures from 2005 to 2013 was reviewed. A small anterolateral left thoracotomy allowed left internal mammary artery harvest, proximal anastomoses on the ascending aorta, and distal coronary anastomoses. Early cases were compared with the later cases, focusing on grafting strategies that led to a standardized approach with Propensity Score Matching analysis. Results Seven hundred consecutive cases were divided into early (1–200) and late (201–700) groups. In the late group, the number of triple-vessel disease patients trended higher (50% vs. 57%, P = 0.0674) and the number of bypasses increased (2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 2.7 ± 1.0, P < 0.0001). Conversion to sternotomy significantly decreased between the groups (6% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in rate of postoperative complications between the groups except for prolonged intubation (10% vs. 5%, P = 0.0236) and shortened length of stay (5.9 ± 6.7 vs. 5.5 ± 6.0, P = 0.0268). Propensity score matching analysis (n = 177) was significant for total bypass performed and time per bypass ( P < 0.05). The late group was further divided into subgroups of one hundred each (subgroup 1 through 5). Operative times differed significantly (subgroup 1: 249 ± 71.2, subgroup 2: 259 ± 85.8, subgroup 3: 244 ± 71.0, subgroup 4: 270 ± 58.4, and subgroup 5: 246 ± 47.9, P < 0.005). Conclusions As experience with minimally invasive coronary surgery coronary artery bypass grafting increased, the ideal sequence of steps to optimize surgical outcome was defined. The number of bypassed vessels increased and the operative time and conversion to sternotomy decreased.