2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-3094-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive internal fixator for unstable pelvic ring injuries with a pedicle screw–rod system: a retrospective study of 23 patients after 13.5 months

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pelvic ring injuries have a prevalence of 20–37/100,000 in the general population and are often caused by severe accidents [1]. Most pelvic ring injuries are caused by (blunt force) high-energy trauma [2], with the majority of the causes being motor vehicle collisions [3, 4]. However, pelvic ring injuries in the elderly are often caused by low-energy accidents, such as a fall on a slippery surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelvic ring injuries have a prevalence of 20–37/100,000 in the general population and are often caused by severe accidents [1]. Most pelvic ring injuries are caused by (blunt force) high-energy trauma [2], with the majority of the causes being motor vehicle collisions [3, 4]. However, pelvic ring injuries in the elderly are often caused by low-energy accidents, such as a fall on a slippery surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of surgical fixation is reconstruction of the lumbopelvic area to avoid malunion and allow early weight-bearing. The transiliac plate 2,3 , sacroiliac screws 4,5 , and transiliac rods fixation 6,7 can be optimal options for posterior pelvic ring injuries. However, all of above are unable to stabilize the lumbopelvic junction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balbachevsky et al reported that external fixation is used for more than 79.5% of patients with a pelvic fracture, especially for patients with multiple injuries and soft tissue damage (1). However, clinical follow-up results showed that external fixation frequently causes infections and pin loosening (in more than 50% patients) and does not effectively stabilize the pelvis, indicating that the current method of external fixation needs to be improved clinically [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%