2018
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery – coming of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the MicroShunt, Baker and coworkers [ 14 ] reported similar rates of endothelial cell loss between the MicroShunt (− 5.2%) and trabeculectomy (− 6.9%) in a large series of surgical patients at 12 months consistent with other reports [ 15 , 25 ]. In a similar fashion, Ibarz-Barberá and coworkers [ 26 ] evaluated the changes in corneal endothelial cell density during the first year following insertion of the implant and reported a 7% loss, which correlated well with the tube–endothelium distance.…”
Section: Safetysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…With regard to the MicroShunt, Baker and coworkers [ 14 ] reported similar rates of endothelial cell loss between the MicroShunt (− 5.2%) and trabeculectomy (− 6.9%) in a large series of surgical patients at 12 months consistent with other reports [ 15 , 25 ]. In a similar fashion, Ibarz-Barberá and coworkers [ 26 ] evaluated the changes in corneal endothelial cell density during the first year following insertion of the implant and reported a 7% loss, which correlated well with the tube–endothelium distance.…”
Section: Safetysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, the report may also suggest a modification in the surgical technique of CyPass Microstent implantation, taking care that no rings are visible on anterior chamber angle gonioscopy or photos, which have been used to grade implantation depth in the COMPASS XT. 3,21,22…”
Section: So What Exactly Is the Cypass Ecl Controversy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which is why the CyPass Micro-Stent gained FDA approval through Premarket Approval (PMA), the most stringent regulatory category for medical devices, while the XEN implant was judged to be “substantially equivalent” to a predicate device, the aqueous shunt implant, and was eligible for FDA registration through the less stringent 510(k) clearance. 3…”
Section: So What Exactly Is the Cypass Ecl Controversy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the available literature identifies micro incisional glaucoma surgery as an emerging option for managing mild to moderate glaucoma 2,3. In this study, the XEN45 implant (micro incisional glaucoma surgery) was used in cases of refractory glaucoma where incisional glaucoma surgeries had previously failed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%