2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00183-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: A prospective multicenter study results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
161
2
27

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
161
2
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Although various treatment alternatives were performed in the hip fracture group, we included only fractures of the distal femur managed with lateral locked plating. Even though similar results have been reported for this treatment modality and retrograde nailing, locked plating is the standard treatment at our institution as it allows fixation in very distal fractures, allows use of the plate for fracture reduction, and in our experience, leads to more reliable fracture alignment [27,31,38,40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Although various treatment alternatives were performed in the hip fracture group, we included only fractures of the distal femur managed with lateral locked plating. Even though similar results have been reported for this treatment modality and retrograde nailing, locked plating is the standard treatment at our institution as it allows fixation in very distal fractures, allows use of the plate for fracture reduction, and in our experience, leads to more reliable fracture alignment [27,31,38,40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…8,9,14,15 Locking compression plate outcomes are favourable in osteoporotic bone and in fractures associated with marked comminution due to rigidity of plate screw construct. 16 The locking compression plate offer multiple points of fixed plate to screws contact, create greater stability and thereby minimize the susceptibility of varus collapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we speculated all these 16 fractures healed, the study nonunion rate would decrease to 14 of 86 (16%). Although some authors have reported a 100% union rate in small series [6,16,31,34,35], most larger series have found a substantial rate of healing difficulties [6,20,[27][28][29]32]. When nonunion, delayed union, the need for secondary surgery, and hardware failure are considered, the rate of healing difficulties reported in the literature is comparable to the rate in our study (Table 6) [6, 7, 11, 14-16, 20, 27-29, 31, 32, 34, 35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%