2020
DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2020.00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Achieving R0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robotic TTE was used in this patient population to further assess the robotic system’s capability to achieve tumor clearance, measured via R0 resection rates, whilst preserving the azygos vein and reducing anastomotic leakage rates. Robot-assisted MAS is associated with higher rates of R0 resection compared with conventional MAS 14 , 29 and open surgery 4 . We provide further evidence to show that R0 resection rates using robot-assisted surgery in patients requiring TTE are comparable to other surgical methods, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of this surgical system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Robotic TTE was used in this patient population to further assess the robotic system’s capability to achieve tumor clearance, measured via R0 resection rates, whilst preserving the azygos vein and reducing anastomotic leakage rates. Robot-assisted MAS is associated with higher rates of R0 resection compared with conventional MAS 14 , 29 and open surgery 4 . We provide further evidence to show that R0 resection rates using robot-assisted surgery in patients requiring TTE are comparable to other surgical methods, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of this surgical system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Compared to open surgery, minimal access surgery (MAS) can minimize intra-operative blood loss, post-operative pneumonia, length of hospital stay, and improve 1-year survival rates in patients requiring esophagectomy 1 , 2 . Aiming to reduce invasiveness and morbidity, MAS has been implemented worldwide and is often preferable to open esophagectomy 3 , 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although minimally invasive esophagectomy is reportedly less invasive than open esophagectomy with respect to perioperative and postoperative outcomes, especially for maintenance of long-term respiratory function, [7][8][9][10] anastomotic leakage may lead to severe intrathoracic infections, including mediastinitis. The following 3 aspects of our technique were designed as a countermeasure to this concern: (1) a linear stapler was used for all anastomotic procedures, from esophagogastric anastomosis to entry hole closure; (2) the pleura was closed to separate the esophagogastric anastomotic site from the thoracic cavity and to prevent deflection of the gastric tube in the right pleural cavity; and (3) the mediastinal drain was inserted transhiatally from the abdominal cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies show an improvement in perioperative morbidity with MIE compared to OE [ 30 , 31 ]. Offering octogenarians an MIE can decrease their post-operative morbidity and improve their oncologic outcomes including resection margin status [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%