2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is as safe as conventional surgery and could reduce costs due to a shorter period spent in ICU.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To increase success rates, improve cosmetic results, and reduce surgical traumas, minimally invasive cardiac surgery has been increasingly applied in the treatment of VSDs, and the number of relevant literatures is increasing [1, 5]. Minimally invasive cardiac surgical techniques usually include the right anterior lateral minimal incision, right axillary minimal incision, and lower sternal minimal incision [6, 19, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To increase success rates, improve cosmetic results, and reduce surgical traumas, minimally invasive cardiac surgery has been increasingly applied in the treatment of VSDs, and the number of relevant literatures is increasing [1, 5]. Minimally invasive cardiac surgical techniques usually include the right anterior lateral minimal incision, right axillary minimal incision, and lower sternal minimal incision [6, 19, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, though interventional occlusion has been extensively applied in the treatment of perimembranous and muscular VSDs, some controversies exist in its application due to its complexity and its potential to damage the aortic valve; thus its application to some extent has been limited [3]. By contrast, minimally invasive cardiac surgery has been increasingly applied to adult coronary revascularization, valvular surgery and congenital heart disease, especially in recent decades [5]. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery includes two primary accesses, right mini-thoracotomy and lower partial sternotomy [4, 6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIDCAB comprises high efficacy of surgical revascularization combined with a minimal traumatic approach due to the use of anterolateral thoracotomy or endoscopy (endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass grafting [EACAB]) for left internal mammary artery (LITA) harvest and anterolateral thoracotomy for suturing the anastomosis. It results in the avoidance of sternotomy, reduction of wound diameter, improved healing and faster recovery [2,3]. Current guidelines for the use of MIDCAB are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of minimally invasive interventional therapy in cardiothoracic, orthopedics, vascular, and other operations has been received extensive attention with the increasing risk control requirements in clinical surgery. [1][2][3][4][5] Compared with traditional large incision or open surgery, the minimally invasive interventional surgery has the advantages of less side effects, less trauma, faster recovery, and stronger targetability. 6,7 As a typical minimally invasive interventional surgery, percutaneous puncture is widely applied in occasions like human-tissue biopsy or directed drug treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%