2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01392-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive biliary anastomosis after iatrogenic bile duct injury: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review of the literature on minimally invasive biliary anastomosis after iatrogenic bile duct injury by Cubisino et al. assessing 12 studies with both laparoscopic and robotic approaches showed that of the 196 patients, 9 had anastomotic strictures with 25% of the robotic and 60% of the laparoscopic cases requiring redoing of the anastomosis 20 . A large retrospective cohort study by Dimou et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A systematic review of the literature on minimally invasive biliary anastomosis after iatrogenic bile duct injury by Cubisino et al. assessing 12 studies with both laparoscopic and robotic approaches showed that of the 196 patients, 9 had anastomotic strictures with 25% of the robotic and 60% of the laparoscopic cases requiring redoing of the anastomosis 20 . A large retrospective cohort study by Dimou et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high rate of conversion to 'open' operations in laparoscopic extrahepatic biliary resections and reconstructions highlight the difficulty in undertaking these complex operations with multiple anatomical and pathological variability. 20,24 This is also true for BDI, where the robotic approach offers a convenient platform to undertake complex reconstructions, including high injuries on the common hepatic duct, while remaining in a minimally invasive approach. [25][26][27] Though many bile duct pathologies are amenable to endoscopic treatment, there are several situations where operative management is crucial such as obtaining an infectious source control by removing an impacted stone, preventing future malignancies while restoring biliary continuity and ruling out a harbored malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although minimally invasive surgery has gained immense popularity in recent years for treating various hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders, it has limitations, especially in complex procedures[ 29 ]. The technical drawbacks related to the laparoscopic approach are an unsteady surgical field, restricted degrees of freedom of movement, a steep learning curve and difficulties in complex suturing[ 30 ]. The complexity of the surgery and the steep learning curve comes from the fact that most patients with BDI would have suffered a bile leak and peritonitis, resulting in extensive adhesions, and altered anatomy[ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Limitations Of Minimally Invasive Surgery For Repair Of Post...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technical drawbacks related to the laparoscopic approach are an unsteady surgical field, restricted degrees of freedom of movement, a steep learning curve and difficulties in complex suturing[ 30 ]. The complexity of the surgery and the steep learning curve comes from the fact that most patients with BDI would have suffered a bile leak and peritonitis, resulting in extensive adhesions, and altered anatomy[ 30 , 31 ]. Also, most patients with BDI have complex strictures (Strasberg E3-E5 types).…”
Section: Limitations Of Minimally Invasive Surgery For Repair Of Post...mentioning
confidence: 99%