2017
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal variation in anti-A and -B titers among healthy volunteers over time

Abstract: Diagnostic study, level V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Automated titrations were performed on a Galileo NEO instrument (Immucor) as previously described, and utilizing an IUO assay, identical to the now approved assay, at the time of testing . The initial IgG or IgM titer result could be quantified to a dilution as high as 128.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated titrations were performed on a Galileo NEO instrument (Immucor) as previously described, and utilizing an IUO assay, identical to the now approved assay, at the time of testing . The initial IgG or IgM titer result could be quantified to a dilution as high as 128.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such significant fluctuations in donor titers over time may be relatively uncommon. In fact, a recent study described stable IgM and IgG anti‐A and anti‐B titers among 56 healthy adult volunteers in southern Denmark who had their antibody titers measured every 3 months over a 1‐year period . These results are interesting because these volunteers were free to go about their daily activities over the course of the year that might have included changing their diets or receiving vaccinations, and yet overall there were only small variations in their antibody titers during the study period.…”
Section: The Never‐ending Quest Part 2: In Search Of a Safe Titer Thrmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Among the 34 centers using group A plasma, there was substantial variation in the amount of group A plasma that could be issued; several hospitals limited the number of units that could be transfused while the majority (21/34, 62%) did not impose a limit on the number of group A plasma units for these patients. The majority (27/34, 79%) of respondents did not determine the anti‐B titer in the group A plasma that was issued to trauma patients, while the others used a maximum anti‐B titer of between less than 25 and less than 100 . The safety of the use of group A plasma in trauma (STAT) study, where 76% of the participants did not determine the titer of anti‐B in the group A plasma issued to trauma patients, found no difference in early mortality, in‐hospital mortality, or hospital length of stay between the group B/AB trauma recipients (n = 354) who received group A plasma during their resuscitation versus the group A trauma patients (n = 809) who also received group A plasma.…”
Section: Breaking Barriers: the Group A Plasma And Group O Wb Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists no standard for answering this question, but there is some experience to guide decision making. In a study of 56 healthy adult volunteers in southern Denmark whose anti‐A and/or ‐B was measured every 3 months for a period of 1 year using an automated solid‐phase instrument, the overall pooled standard deviation (SD) between these serial titer measurements ranged from 0.30 to 0.47 log 2 titer steps . For reference, a titer of 8 would be equivalent to a log 2 titer step of 3 and a titer of 16 would be equivalent to a log 2 titer step of 4, so the pooled SDs of these 56 volunteers reflects a variation of less than half of a titer dilution.…”
Section: Immunohematologic Considerations For Transfusing Group O Wbmentioning
confidence: 99%