2012
DOI: 10.1177/0962280212436447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal sufficient balance—a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation

Abstract: In many clinical trials, baseline covariates could affect the primary outcome. Commonly used strategies to balance baseline covariates include stratified constrained randomization and minimization. Stratification is limited to few categorical covariates. Minimization lacks the randomness of treatment allocation. Both apply only to categorical covariates. As a result, serious imbalances could occur in important baseline covariates not included in the randomization algorithm. Furthermore, randomness of treatment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation shows that the minimization method works better than the hierarchical biased coin design. Minimization method has been proven as the most effective treatment allocation algorithm for simultaneously balancing multiple baseline covariates in multicenter clinical trials [25, 26]. However, the high proportion of deterministic assignments remains a serious concern as it may lead to treatment allocation concealment failure and potential selection bias [21, 25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation shows that the minimization method works better than the hierarchical biased coin design. Minimization method has been proven as the most effective treatment allocation algorithm for simultaneously balancing multiple baseline covariates in multicenter clinical trials [25, 26]. However, the high proportion of deterministic assignments remains a serious concern as it may lead to treatment allocation concealment failure and potential selection bias [21, 25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high proportion of deterministic assignments remains a serious concern as it may lead to treatment allocation concealment failure and potential selection bias [21, 25]. Furthermore, the necessity of strict imbalance control in randomized controlled large multicenter clinical trials is highly questionable [26]. To alleviate these two problems, we can consider a modified version of the minimization method with an imbalance control threshold δ and a biased coin probability p bc .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54,55 When used in large trials such as IST-3, overall balance is achievable, but correction methods were still necessary for subgroup analysis. Adaptive designs include minimization routines that identify key prognostic factors to guide treatment assignments.…”
Section: Innovative Study Design May Introducementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention effect estimates were exaggerated when there was inadequate allocation concealment in trials where a subjective outcome was analyzed, but there was little evidence of bias in trials with objective outcomes. 5 Zhao et al 6 describe the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPP) trial, which is an example of how selection bias can occur when technology is not used for the implementation of randomization. The purpose of the CAPP trial was to compare the treatment of hypertension by an angiotensin-convertingenzyme inhibitor (captopril) with the conventional therapy.…”
Section: Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%