2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0361768820020103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Representations and Algebraic Relations for Single Nested Products

Abstract: Recently, it has been shown constructively how a finite set of hypergeometric products, multibasic hypergeometric products or their mixed versions can be modeled properly in the setting of formal difference rings. Here special emphasis is put on robust constructions: whenever further products have to be considered, one can reuse -up to some mild modifications-the already existing difference ring. In this article we relax this robustness criteria and seek for another form of optimality. We will elaborate a gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we will rely on the following property of ΠΣ-ield extensions; the irst statement has been shown in [12] for ΠΣ-ields. The second statement appears also in [25].…”
Section: Polynomial Ring Extension With ( )− ∈mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Here we will rely on the following property of ΠΣ-ield extensions; the irst statement has been shown in [12] for ΠΣ-ields. The second statement appears also in [25].…”
Section: Polynomial Ring Extension With ( )− ∈mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…however, only be interpreted as a sequence in K N from some term on (cf. the discussion in Section 8.2 in [27] or [28]). For instance, the sequence 3 n 2 n −1 cannot be evaluated at the term n = 0.…”
Section: Torsion Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the closed form of C-finite sequences it is clear that these sequences can be seen as special cases of sums of single nested product expressions. The torsion number can be used to find a certain algebraic independent basis of these sequences [28].…”
Section: Torsion Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internally, this problem can be rephrased in the setting of difference rings [51,[62][63][64], and the problem can be decided afterwards in this setting using the algorithms from [19,39,52,56,58,59,67]. More precisely, if these algorithms fail to find a solution, one obtains a proof that the sequence F(n) cannot be represented within the class of indefinite nested sums.…”
Section: Solving Linear Recurrence Relations In Terms Of Indefinite Nmentioning
confidence: 99%