2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal realizations of nonlinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the theoretical side, we prove that if a DAE of order ℎ can be realized by a system in the state-space form, then it can be realized by a system of dimension ℎ (that is, by a locally observable one). This result is related to a theorem by Sussmann [19] and its analogues for rational realizations [11] (see also [6,20]) which state that, for a realization problem (analytic or rational), if a realization exists, it can always be taken to be observable at the expense of allowing a realization to be defined not on an affine space but on an arbitrary variety. We achieve only local observability but guarantee the existence of a realization defined on an affine space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the theoretical side, we prove that if a DAE of order ℎ can be realized by a system in the state-space form, then it can be realized by a system of dimension ℎ (that is, by a locally observable one). This result is related to a theorem by Sussmann [19] and its analogues for rational realizations [11] (see also [6,20]) which state that, for a realization problem (analytic or rational), if a realization exists, it can always be taken to be observable at the expense of allowing a realization to be defined not on an affine space but on an arbitrary variety. We achieve only local observability but guarantee the existence of a realization defined on an affine space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the nonlinear case, there are several versions of the problem depending on where f and g are sought. Two popular classes considered in this paper are rational functions and input-affine rational functions as in [11,12,17], but one could also consider algebraic, analytic, or smooth functions [14,19,20,22]. From the constructive standpoint, the case of single-output-no-input systems (for which rational and inputaffine rational functions coincide) has been considered by Forsman [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear quadratic regulator is the extension of pole placement technique that tends to find the control input so as to place the poles of the system at a desired optimal position. The main idea in linear quadratic regulator control design is to minimize the quadratic cost function of J given in (9) [24], [25].…”
Section: Systemanalysis and Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LQR should minimize this cost function (performance index) while obtaining the state feedback gains K that drives the system to the desired operating point. It turns out that regardless of the values of Q and R, the cost function has a unique minimum that can be obtained by solving the following Algebraic Riccati equation [25].…”
Section: Systemanalysis and Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nonlinear case, there are several versions of the problem depending on where f and g are sought. Two popular classes considered in this paper are rational functions and input-affine rational functions as in [12,13,21], but one could also consider algebraic, analytic, or smooth functions [18,23,24,26]. From the constructive standpoint, the case of single-output-no-input systems (for which rational and input-affine rational functions coincide) has been considered by Forsman [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%