2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.85.095009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal flavor violation supersymmetry: A natural theory forR-parity violation

Abstract: We present an alternative approach to low-energy supersymmetry. Instead of imposing R-parity we apply the minimal flavor violation (MFV) hypothesis to the R-parity violating MSSM. In this framework, which we call MFV SUSY, squarks can be light and the proton long lived without producing missing energy signals at the LHC. Our approach differs from that of Nikolidakis and Smith in that we impose holomorphy on the MFV spurions. The resulting model is highly constrained and R-parity emerges as an accidental approx… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
178
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, aside from the baryon violating A-term, all visible sector soft masses arise directly from gauge mediation, so their flavor structure comes entirely from Yukawa couplings. Thus, up to an overall coefficient, our n −n oscillation amplitudes are identical to those computed in [4]. Chirality-preserving flavor-violating masses arise predominantly from MSSM F -terms after SUSY and electroweak symmetry breaking through Figure 10.…”
Section: N −N Oscillationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, aside from the baryon violating A-term, all visible sector soft masses arise directly from gauge mediation, so their flavor structure comes entirely from Yukawa couplings. Thus, up to an overall coefficient, our n −n oscillation amplitudes are identical to those computed in [4]. Chirality-preserving flavor-violating masses arise predominantly from MSSM F -terms after SUSY and electroweak symmetry breaking through Figure 10.…”
Section: N −N Oscillationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…where λ 0.23 comes from the approximate CKM matrix parametrization in [4]. The oscillation timescale is approximately τ n−n ∼ M −1 , thus the experimental bound τ n−n ≥ 2.44 × 10 8 sec.…”
Section: N −N Oscillationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations