2014
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells

Abstract: Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics typically employs multistep sample-preparation workflows that are subject to sample contamination and loss. We report an in-StageTip method for performing sample processing, from cell lysis through elution of purified peptides, in a single, enclosed volume. This robust and scalable method largely eliminates contamination or loss. Peptides can be eluted in several fractions or in one step for single-run proteome analysis. In one day, we obtained the largest proteome cover… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
1,580
3
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,476 publications
(1,638 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
36
1,580
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are in good agreement with estimates reported in previous large‐scale proteomics studies (Nagaraj et al , 2011; Kulak et al , 2014; Hein et al , 2015), and this adds confidence to our use of γ‐tubulin data for calibration purposes. Also, we emphasize that although this calibration is critical for calculations of exact absolute copy numbers, any future correction of γ‐tubulin abundance would not affect relative numbers or any of the major conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are in good agreement with estimates reported in previous large‐scale proteomics studies (Nagaraj et al , 2011; Kulak et al , 2014; Hein et al , 2015), and this adds confidence to our use of γ‐tubulin data for calibration purposes. Also, we emphasize that although this calibration is critical for calculations of exact absolute copy numbers, any future correction of γ‐tubulin abundance would not affect relative numbers or any of the major conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Comprehensive studies on the proteomes of cells, tissues, or organisms have been reported (e.g. Addona et al , 2009; Nilsson et al , 2010; Beck et al , 2011; Nagaraj et al , 2011; for review, see Bensimon et al , 2012; Kulak et al , 2014; Wilhelm et al , 2014; Hein et al , 2015; Richards et al , 2015), but accurate quantitative information on proteins expressed at low levels remains scarce. As a consequence, published estimates for the abundance of specific proteins sometimes vary over several orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptides reconstituted in 0.5% FA were loaded onto small cation exchange (Empore Cation Exchange-SR, Supelco Analytical) stage-tips made in-house. 43 Tips were washed with 20% acetonitrile (ACN), 0.5% FA and eluted over five fractions of increasing amounts (45À300 mM) freshly prepared ammonium acetate, 20% ACN, 0.5% FA, followed by a final elution of 5% ammonium hydroxide, 80% ACN. Fractions were concentrated by vacuum centrifugation and desalted on SDB-XC poly(styrene-divinyl-benzene; Supelco Analytical) stagetips as previously described.…”
Section: Mitochondrial Protein Synthesis Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractions were concentrated by vacuum centrifugation and desalted on SDB-XC poly(styrene-divinyl-benzene; Supelco Analytical) stagetips as previously described. 40,43 Peptides were reconstituted in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and 2% ACN and analyzed by online nano-HPLC/electrospray ionization-MS/MS on a Q Exactive Plus connected to an Ultimate 3000 HPLC (Thermo-Fisher Scientific). Peptides were loaded onto a trap column (Acclaim C 18 PepMap nano Trap 3 2 cm, 100 mm I.D, 5 mm particle size, and 300 Å pore size; ThermoFisher Scientific) at 15 mL/min for 3 min before switching the pre-column in line with the analytical column (Acclaim RSLC C 18 PepMap Acclaim RSLC nanocolumn 75 mm 3 50 cm, PepMap100 C 18 , 3 mm particle size 100 Å pore size; ThermoFisher Scientific).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Protein Synthesis Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, for subsequent proteomic analysis, cells were processed by in-StageTip (iST) method. 74 Briefly, the pellets were lysed, reduced, alkylated in a single step using a buffer containing 2% (w/v) SDC (sodium deoxycholate), 10 mM TCEP (Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride), 40 mM CAA (chloroacetamide), 100 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0, and loaded into StageTip. The lysates were diluted with 25 mM Tris pH 8.5 containing 1 µg of trypsin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%