2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Effects of Age and Exposure to a Noisy Environment on Hearing in Alpha9 Nicotinic Receptor Knockout Mice

Abstract: Studies have suggested a role of weakened medial olivocochlear (OC) efferent feedback in accelerated hearing loss and increased susceptibility to noise. The present study investigated the progression of hearing loss with age and exposure to a noisy environment in medial OC-deficient mice. Alpha9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor knockout (α9KO) and wild types were screened for hearing loss using auditory brainstem responses. α9KO mice housed in a quiet environment did not show increased hearing loss compared to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
6
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 50% PPI response changes with the MOC pathway silenced or over-activated, are similar to what is predicted by the rate-level functions of auditory unit recordings with and without MOC stimulation (Winslow and Sachs, 1987 , 1988 ; Sachs et al, 1989 ). We had expected to observe a PPI threshold shift in background noise but did not observe any significant differences, yet this lack of significance could be due to the higher variance observed in the α9 nAChR (–/–) animals, as has been observed in other studies using this mouse line (Lauer, 2017 ). We are not sure if higher order pathways could have compensated for genetically altered MOC feedback (Salvi et al, 2000 , 2016 ; Auerbach et al, 2014 ), yet if there was higher-order compensation, this compensation did not fully negate changes observed in the CGRP (–/–) animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These 50% PPI response changes with the MOC pathway silenced or over-activated, are similar to what is predicted by the rate-level functions of auditory unit recordings with and without MOC stimulation (Winslow and Sachs, 1987 , 1988 ; Sachs et al, 1989 ). We had expected to observe a PPI threshold shift in background noise but did not observe any significant differences, yet this lack of significance could be due to the higher variance observed in the α9 nAChR (–/–) animals, as has been observed in other studies using this mouse line (Lauer, 2017 ). We are not sure if higher order pathways could have compensated for genetically altered MOC feedback (Salvi et al, 2000 , 2016 ; Auerbach et al, 2014 ), yet if there was higher-order compensation, this compensation did not fully negate changes observed in the CGRP (–/–) animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We recorded ABRs 1 month after exposure to measure auditory sensitivity and determine if the auditory brainstem exhibited hyperactivity. Procedures were similar to those described by McGuire et al (2015) and Lauer (2017) . Mice were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine and 20 mg/kg xylazine and placed on a heating pad inside a small sound-attenuating chamber (IAC) lined with Sonex acoustic foam to reduce acoustic reflections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ABR threshold was calculated automatically, using a custom MATLAB script. The threshold was defined as the sound intensity level at which the peak-totrough amplitude of the ABR wave was at least two standard deviations above the mean baseline amplitude estimated from the last 5 ms in the recording when no sound stimulus was present (Lina and Lauer, 2013;McGuire et al, 2015;Lauer, 2017;Schrode et al, 2018). A value of 95 dB SPL was used as a threshold for cases where one could not be found.…”
Section: Auditory Brainstem Response (Abr)mentioning
confidence: 99%