2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Detectable Change in Quadriceps Strength and Voluntary Muscle Activation in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
3
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
70
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, calculation of VA 60-100% may be less accurate for submaximal muscle stimulation. However, in common practice, when VA is usually determined by the superimposed responses upon the highest of a few maximal voluntary contractions, 9,[22][23][24] there are indications that VA may be overestimated with maximal nerve stimulation. Several subjects were able to elicit voluntary torques above MTC 100% , and consequently VA 100% was calculated to be above 100%.…”
Section: Discussion Superimposed Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, calculation of VA 60-100% may be less accurate for submaximal muscle stimulation. However, in common practice, when VA is usually determined by the superimposed responses upon the highest of a few maximal voluntary contractions, 9,[22][23][24] there are indications that VA may be overestimated with maximal nerve stimulation. Several subjects were able to elicit voluntary torques above MTC 100% , and consequently VA 100% was calculated to be above 100%.…”
Section: Discussion Superimposed Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in most studies VA has been calculated with the superimposed responses upon the highest of a few maximal voluntary contractions. 9,[22][23][24] However, if the relationship indeed is curvilinear, VA is overestimated for lower contraction intensities, 2,3,7,25 such as those observed in patients. 2,9,10,12 For maximal contractions VA may also be overestimated, but without a gold standard for the maximal torque capacity (MTC), the extent of overestimation cannot be assessed.…”
Section: Muscle Nerve 45: 841-848 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This normalized measure (in Nm/kg) was used for the analyses. Excellent intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.93) has been reported for this measure in knee OA patients (28).…”
Section: Biomechanical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[16][17][18] Here, a large variation in PF forces is apparent, especially for activities involving high knee flexion, 1 with PF forces during squatting ranging from 1.9 19 to 3.1 BW 15 at 1008 flexion. While some of the variations can be explained by variations in musculoskeletal competence and the specific joint anatomy, 20 the large spread in PF forces could also stem from oversimplified modeling assumptions and inaccurate input data. Here, the kinematics of the limb play a key role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%