1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00469-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal conditions for the creation of a Friedman–Robertson–Walker universe from a “bounce”

Abstract: In this Letter we investigate the minimal conditions under which the creation of our universe might arise due to a "bounce" from a previous collapse, rather than an explosion from a big-bang singularity. Such a bounce is sometimes referred to as a Tolman wormhole. We subject the bounce to a general model-independent analysis along the lines of that applied to the Morris-Thorne traversable wormholes, and show that there is always an open temporal region surrounding the bounce over which the strong energy condit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
144
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
144
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two questions have recurred often in theoretical cosmology [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]: 1) is the Universe eternal or did it have a beginning at some definite time in the past?, and 2) is it possible to make Universes with one or more "bounces" where the scale factor crunches and then bangs? 1 The answers to these two questions are deeply intertwined with the subject matter of the singularity theorems of Penrose and Hawking (discussed comprehensively in [10]).…”
Section: Jhep02(2014)029mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two questions have recurred often in theoretical cosmology [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]: 1) is the Universe eternal or did it have a beginning at some definite time in the past?, and 2) is it possible to make Universes with one or more "bounces" where the scale factor crunches and then bangs? 1 The answers to these two questions are deeply intertwined with the subject matter of the singularity theorems of Penrose and Hawking (discussed comprehensively in [10]).…”
Section: Jhep02(2014)029mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means, given that there is already some radiation present, that, in the context of GR, there must exist some other fluid having negative energy. In particular, for the special case at hand for which the spatial curvature K = 0, this means that the Null Energy Condition (NEC) must be violated at some time near the bounce [14].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its latest version [11], moreover, the model also * Electronic address: peter@iap.fr † Electronic address: nelsonpn@cbpf.br contains a supposedly actual singularity [12]. Quantum cosmology, in the framework of the Wheelerde-Witt (WdW) equation, exhibits bouncing solutions [13] which can be interpreted as truly avoiding the singularity, even for flat (K = 0) spatial sections, a possibility strictly forbidden in classical General Relativity (GR), unless [14] some exotic material, with negative energy density violating the Null Energy Condition (NEC) [15], is introduced, which most cosmologists are reluctant on doing. Such a bouncing universe model provides a solution to the horizon problem by geodesically completing the manifold in the past, and avoids the monopole formation if the bounce takes place at a temperature below that of Grand Unification (GUT); this class of models does not however address the question of flatness and one must assume K = 0 from the outset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) to c 2 A ≡ 1 − 3(1 − c 2 s )K/k 2 , [10]; as eqs. (3)(4)(5) are complete set for single component, this prescription applies always in the single scalar field case. It is convenient to have…”
Section: Cosmological Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific realizations of the bounce and the conditions required to have the FLRW (Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker) world model from a bounce were studied in [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%