2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.09.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal conditions for implications of Gronwall–Bellman type

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP url' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. Abstract Gronwall-Bellman type inequalities entail the following implication: if a sufficiently integrable function satisfies a certain homogeneous linear integral inequality, then it is n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and by(3.8), joint with (3.6), we get 0 ≤ w(a + ) ≤ w(a) ≤ 0. If τ > a, then, by definition of τ , w(τ − ) ≤ 0.Using (3.8) joint with (3.5) and (3.6), we also have 0 ≤ w(τ + ) ≤ w(τ − ) ≤ 0, and the claim is proved.Therefore, since w(τ ) = 0, (3.4) reads as follows: for every s ∈ (τ, t 0 ) we havew(s) ≤ L ˆs τ w(ρ) dρ.By the integral form of the Gronwall inequality (see for instance[22, Lemma 3.2], which is a particular case of [23, Theorem 3.1]) , we get w ≤ 0 in [τ, t 0 ], which is in contradiction with (3.7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…and by(3.8), joint with (3.6), we get 0 ≤ w(a + ) ≤ w(a) ≤ 0. If τ > a, then, by definition of τ , w(τ − ) ≤ 0.Using (3.8) joint with (3.5) and (3.6), we also have 0 ≤ w(τ + ) ≤ w(τ − ) ≤ 0, and the claim is proved.Therefore, since w(τ ) = 0, (3.4) reads as follows: for every s ∈ (τ, t 0 ) we havew(s) ≤ L ˆs τ w(ρ) dρ.By the integral form of the Gronwall inequality (see for instance[22, Lemma 3.2], which is a particular case of [23, Theorem 3.1]) , we get w ≤ 0 in [τ, t 0 ], which is in contradiction with (3.7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%