Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales

Abstract

Background Several quality of recovery (QoR) health status scales have been developed to quantify the patient’s experience after anesthesia and surgery, but to date, it is unclear what constitutes the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). That is, what minimal change in score would indicate a meaningful change in a patient’s health status? Methods The authors enrolled a sequential, unselected cohort of patients recovering from surgery and used three QoR scales (the 9-item QoR score, the 15-item QoR-15, and the 40-item QoR-40) to quantify a patient’s recovery after surgery and anesthesia. The authors compared changes in patient QoR scores with a global rating of change questionnaire using an anchor-based method and three distribution-based methods (0.3 SD, standard error of the measurement, and 5% range). The authors then averaged the change estimates to determine the MCID for each QoR scale. Results The authors enrolled 204 patients at the first postoperative visit, and 199 were available for a second interview; a further 24 patients were available at the third interview. The QoR scores improved significantly between the first two interviews. Triangulation of distribution- and anchor-based methods results in an MCID of 0.92, 8.0, and 6.3 for the QoR score, QoR-15, and QoR-40, respectively. Conclusion Perioperative interventions that result in a change of 0.9 for the QoR score, 8.0 for the QoR-15, or 6.3 for the QoR-40 signify a clinically important improvement or deterioration.

Single-Dose Adductor Canal Block With Local Infiltrative Analgesia Compared With Local Infiltrate Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty

“…Opioid consumption in the immediate postsurgical period has been shown to be inversely related to quality of patient recovery, 27 and the observed reduction in opioid consumption in this study would likely be associated with improved quality of recovery. 28 Our findings must be interpreted within the context of the study's limitations. Although we were able to show differences in analgesia outcomes and time to discharge, the number of patients studied and number of comparisons may have increased the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis.…”

Randomized trial of acupressure to improve patient satisfaction and quality of recovery in hospitalized patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

“…The QoR-15 score was developed to determine a self-rated patient measure of overall health status [6] and has undergone psychometric and external validation [17]. The QoR-15 score is easy to administer and has been validated to detect clinically important differences in patient-perceived health status [32]. Therefore, we believe it is a relevant endpoint for assessing acupressure therapy effectiveness in this setting.…”

Effectiveness of deep versus moderate muscle relaxation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in enhancing postoperative recovery: study protocol for a randomized controlled study

“…We performed a power calculation based on the assumption that the minimal clinically important difference is 10 points. Recently Myles et al published data [21], in which they estimate a 6.3 point difference as the minimal clinically important difference for the QoR-40 score. This estimate was based on triangulation of distribution- and anchor based calculations of the minimal clinically important difference.…”