2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniaturized multi-coil arrays for functional planar imaging with a single-sided NMR sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although all the samples displayed good agreement between measurements taken at different depths, it is conceivable that in some situations measurements could be sensitive to the precise positioning of the sensor. Alternative designs of portable‐NMR instrumentation may be able to alleviate both these issues by enabling a larger sensing volume …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although all the samples displayed good agreement between measurements taken at different depths, it is conceivable that in some situations measurements could be sensitive to the precise positioning of the sensor. Alternative designs of portable‐NMR instrumentation may be able to alleviate both these issues by enabling a larger sensing volume …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR-MOUSE has also been miniaturized and fitted with multilayered micro-coils (Fig. 2j, k) (Watzlaw et al, 2013;Oligschläger et al, 2014Oligschläger et al, , 2015a, by which, on the expense of 7.6-fold lower sensitivity compared to the PM5 NMR-MOUSE at 1 mm access depth, the dead time of the measurement could be reduced to a record 10 µs echo time. With its small coil, the signal from the cement regions be- tween the stone aggregate in cuts of concrete could be focused on, and with an echo time ≤ 20 µs, the hitherto hidden signals from bound water in the dry gray cement could be measured (Fig.…”
Section: The Nmr-mouse In the Housementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, each new technique utilized for single-sided devices is often evaluated in terms of its sensitivity. The relative SNR B1iR [20] was used in this study to evaluate the designed RF coil, where B1/i is the coil sensitivity that is defined by the law of reciprocity as the magnetic flux density B 1 caused by an RF current i passes through the coil, and R is the alternating-current impedance resistance of the coil. A common printed circuit board (PCB) coil with the same size as the designed RF coil was available for comparison.…”
Section: Sensor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common design of RF coils explored for UMRI sensors is a single current loop in the plane for a B 1 field perpendicular to the face of the coil and a figure-of-eight-like coil with two opposing current loops for a B 1 field parallel to the face of the coil [4]. Despite several special RF coils, such as microstructured [20] and arc-shaped spiral RF coils [21], adopted for a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and sensitivity improvement, the RF coil design considerations for UMRI systems have been largely overshadowed by the attention given to single-sided magnet design. RF coil efficiency is critical at low fields typical of single-sided systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%