2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0885715612000516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniaturization of mechanical milling for powder X-ray diffraction

Abstract: To enable mechanical milling of small (0.1–1.0 g) samples, a cylindrical grinding vessel machined from polypropylene and furnished with tungsten carbide rods has been designed and produced for use inside the conventional jar of a McCrone Micronizing Mill. The vessel is about one-seventh the volume of the conventional jar supplied by the manufacturer. The conditions of milling for both the conventional and the miniaturized-grinding assemblies were tested using quartz sand as a limiting case. The median grain si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, the XRD technique was applied to calculate the wt% of aragonite phase using the diffraction peak heights. 10,32,46 The calibration curve of the standard peak heights was obtained by measuring each pure polymorphic powder (calcite and aragonite) using XRD. For aragonite phase identification, diffraction peaks of (111) and (021) planes at 2 θ angles of 26.25° and 27.23° were used, whereas the (104) plane positioned at a 2 θ angle of 29.43° was used for calcite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this research, the XRD technique was applied to calculate the wt% of aragonite phase using the diffraction peak heights. 10,32,46 The calibration curve of the standard peak heights was obtained by measuring each pure polymorphic powder (calcite and aragonite) using XRD. For aragonite phase identification, diffraction peaks of (111) and (021) planes at 2 θ angles of 26.25° and 27.23° were used, whereas the (104) plane positioned at a 2 θ angle of 29.43° was used for calcite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of aragonite in each sample was calculated by the standard curve technique, as described in ref. 10 and 32.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because opal was tentatively identified in several samples using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (see results), 10% (w/w) of synthetic CaF 2 was added to each sample as an internal standard for quantification of this amorphous phase. Following the addition of CaF 2 , each sample was ground for a further 40 s under anhydrous ethanol using stainless steel elements in a miniaturized McCrone milling assembly (using the design of Locock et al., 2012). Following McCrone milling, each powdered sample was mounted in a back‐loaded cavity mount against a piece of frosted glass to minimize the preferred orientation of crystallites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mineralogical composition was determined by Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD) with a PANalytical X'Pert PRO diffractometer in Bragg-Brentano geometry equipped with a cobalt X-ray tube and a X'Celerator detector (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK). Powder samples were micronized following the indications proposed by Locock et al [34]. The working conditions were CoKα radiation, 40 kV voltage, 30 mÅ current, 3-70 • 2θ range, step size 0.02 • and 1 s counts per step.…”
Section: Color Composition and Texturementioning
confidence: 99%