2003
DOI: 10.1081/asr-120021167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniaturization of Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the introduction of novel ionization methods for modern mass spectrometric (MS) analysis, such as electrospray ionization (ESI) by Fenn et al [3] and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) by Tanaka et al [4] and independently by Karas and Hillenkamp [5], in the late eighties, scientists employing modern mass spectrometric tools face new challenges with respect to background ions that might not have played significant roles in traditional or other well-established routine analytical methodologies. The ongoing efforts to further miniaturize liquid chromatography (LC) methods [6], combinations of LC/MS [7][8][9][10][11][12], the development of capillary electrophoresis combined with MS (CE/MS) [13] including microfluidic chip-based mass spectrometry [14][15][16][17], make it easy to predict that knowledge of potential interferences and background ions will become increasingly important for successful future development of GLP-adhering methods in routine and research analytical methodologies. Miniaturization of sample transfer procedures and handling tools increases exponentially the surface to sample volume ratio and thus any interferences resulting from contaminated or background leaching surfaces will consequently also multiply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the introduction of novel ionization methods for modern mass spectrometric (MS) analysis, such as electrospray ionization (ESI) by Fenn et al [3] and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) by Tanaka et al [4] and independently by Karas and Hillenkamp [5], in the late eighties, scientists employing modern mass spectrometric tools face new challenges with respect to background ions that might not have played significant roles in traditional or other well-established routine analytical methodologies. The ongoing efforts to further miniaturize liquid chromatography (LC) methods [6], combinations of LC/MS [7][8][9][10][11][12], the development of capillary electrophoresis combined with MS (CE/MS) [13] including microfluidic chip-based mass spectrometry [14][15][16][17], make it easy to predict that knowledge of potential interferences and background ions will become increasingly important for successful future development of GLP-adhering methods in routine and research analytical methodologies. Miniaturization of sample transfer procedures and handling tools increases exponentially the surface to sample volume ratio and thus any interferences resulting from contaminated or background leaching surfaces will consequently also multiply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mass spectrometry, the main focus has been on the miniaturization of ion sources. Among the atmospheric pressure ionization (API) techniques for mass spectrometry (MS), electrospray ionization (ESI) is the most widely used, and thus miniaturization of ESI sources has been the most popular 3. However, miniaturized ESI sources can suffer from poor signal stability and low lifetime,4–6 whereas other miniaturized API sources, such as micro‐atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (µAPCI) and micro‐atmospheric pressure photoionization (µAPPI), have shown excellent signal stabilities lasting several hours, and lifetimes of up to several weeks 7, 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the ESI source occupies a key position, which can decide upon the success of mass spectrometric experiments,51–53 we started our studies with the evaluation of the usability of three different source designs, namely, Nanospray, MicroIonspray, and MicroTurboIonspray. Our major concern was getting the highest mass spectrometric sensitivity at flow rates compatible with the needs of the chromatographic method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%