2018
DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2018.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miniature in Everything but Meaning: A Contextual Analysis of Miniature Vessels at Homol'ovi I

Abstract: The most common explanations for the appearance of miniatures in the archaeological record are drawn from practice theory. Two alternatives stem from learning theories, while a third is based in ritual practice and performance. First, miniatures may represent early attempts at craft production by children or novice adults. Second, they could serve as children's toys used for enculturation purposes. Third, miniatures may be produced for use in rituals or as offerings. These explanations are not mutually exclusi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around 43 per cent of the decorated pieces have asymmetries and errors in their decorations, while 62.5 per cent of the total sample have cracks and irregularities in the shapes of their bodies, lips or surfaces (Tables 3 & 5). These aspects, which are also common among miniatures from diverse archaeological contexts, have led them to be evaluated as potential children's toys (Carey 2006; Fladd & Barker 2019; Prous & Jácome 2007, among others), including the first referents of archaeology in the Paraná River Lowlands (González 1947; Serrano 1946). Ethnographic information indicates that children tend to imitate the activities of adults, making small versions of useful artifacts.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Role Of Miniatures Within The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Around 43 per cent of the decorated pieces have asymmetries and errors in their decorations, while 62.5 per cent of the total sample have cracks and irregularities in the shapes of their bodies, lips or surfaces (Tables 3 & 5). These aspects, which are also common among miniatures from diverse archaeological contexts, have led them to be evaluated as potential children's toys (Carey 2006; Fladd & Barker 2019; Prous & Jácome 2007, among others), including the first referents of archaeology in the Paraná River Lowlands (González 1947; Serrano 1946). Ethnographic information indicates that children tend to imitate the activities of adults, making small versions of useful artifacts.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Role Of Miniatures Within The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data in relation to the vessels’ firing were taken from pieces that presented some previous fractures, where it was possible to observe the colour of the paste. Errors and irregularities in the manufacture and decoration of the pieces were identified, aspects that have been used to evaluate the skill of the potter and children's agency (Fladd & Barker 2019; Kamp 2001; Langdon 2013; Menon & Varma 2011; Park 2010, among others). The presence and localization of traces of use were recorded macroscopically, such as remnants of pigments, soot and organic residue that had adhered and absorbed ( sensu Reber & Hart 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the original publication of this article (Fladd and Barker 2018), Figure 2 was published without obtaining permission, due to an oversight. The article has since been corrected and Figure 2 replaced with a new version.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%