2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.20.524941
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mini-MEndR: A 96-well mixed species culture assay to co-evaluate human and mouse Pax7+cell-mediated skeletal muscle repair

Abstract: Functional evaluation of novel molecules that promote stem cell mediated endogenous repair often require multiplexed in vivo transplant studies that are low throughput and hinder the rate of discovery. Here, we optimized and miniaturized a previously developed muscle endogenous repair (MEndR) in vitro assay that captures significant events of in vivo muscle endogenous repair to offer greater throughput for functional validation studies. The mini-MEndR assay consists of miniaturized cellulose scaffolds designed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four paper scaffold candidates were selected from a larger pool of candidate cellulose-based papers based on thickness and similarity of the material to the original paper scaffold used in for the MEndR [27] and mini-MEndR [32] protocols (Mini-Minit Products, R10, Scarborough, Canada). Each of the four paper candidates were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess their microstructural properties and for their ability to support myoblast differentiation, and compared to the original paper scaffold.…”
Section: Paper Scaffold Candidate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Four paper scaffold candidates were selected from a larger pool of candidate cellulose-based papers based on thickness and similarity of the material to the original paper scaffold used in for the MEndR [27] and mini-MEndR [32] protocols (Mini-Minit Products, R10, Scarborough, Canada). Each of the four paper candidates were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess their microstructural properties and for their ability to support myoblast differentiation, and compared to the original paper scaffold.…”
Section: Paper Scaffold Candidate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate tissue homogeneity, tissues were imaged at either 4X or 10X magnification, with the settings described in Table 4. SAA + coverage was quantified as previously described; [27,32] briefly, confocal image stacks were maximum Z-projected and thresholded either manually or using FIJI's triangle algorithm, where the percentage of pixels brighter than the threshold was taken as a metric of image coverage by SAA + myotubes. To assess myofiber morphology, tissues were imaged at 40X magnification, with the objective correction collar being adjusted to optimize focus (Table 4).…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations