2014
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(14)60755-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mini-Cog Performance: A Novel Marker of Risk Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
69
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
69
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Current use of mHealth or smart phone technology was not an inclusion criterion because we wanted a range of experiences and perceptions. Potential “in-person” participants were excluded if they were unable to read/understand English, had a history of dementia or had cognitive impairment (Mini-Cog 21,22 score ≤ 2), resided in a nursing home (prior to hospital admission), or were hospitalized for acute MIs and/or need emergent cardiac surgery, or advanced stage of HF (NYHA functional class IV – patient exhibits HF symptoms/shortness of breath even at rest per assigned nurse’s report). Intact cognitive functioning was assumed for the “online” group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current use of mHealth or smart phone technology was not an inclusion criterion because we wanted a range of experiences and perceptions. Potential “in-person” participants were excluded if they were unable to read/understand English, had a history of dementia or had cognitive impairment (Mini-Cog 21,22 score ≤ 2), resided in a nursing home (prior to hospital admission), or were hospitalized for acute MIs and/or need emergent cardiac surgery, or advanced stage of HF (NYHA functional class IV – patient exhibits HF symptoms/shortness of breath even at rest per assigned nurse’s report). Intact cognitive functioning was assumed for the “online” group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borson et al, (2005) documented that the Mini-Cog had an overall accuracy (true positives+true negatives/true positive+true negatives+false positives+false negatives) of 83% classifying participants as cognitively impaired or normal cognition in a sample of 371 community dwelling, ethnically diverse participants. Finally, the Mini-Cog has documented validity in HF samples 40,41 . Most recently, Patel et al (2014) reported that among patients hospitalized with HF, Mini-Cog scores were associated with poor 30-day outcomes 40 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the Mini-Cog has documented validity in HF samples 40,41 . Most recently, Patel et al (2014) reported that among patients hospitalized with HF, Mini-Cog scores were associated with poor 30-day outcomes 40 . There are a variety of administration and scoring methods for the Mini-Cog assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mini‐Cog is a short, validated tool for the assessment of cognitive impairment consisting of 3‐word recall and a simple clock‐drawing task . When trained clinicians or research personnel administer it, it takes less than 3 minutes to complete, making it a potentially attractive tool for healthcare systems interested in population‐wide screening for cognitive impairment .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional instructions and multiple word sets were later added for repeated use, and the tool was reformatted to increase reliability in randomized screening trials . We previously implemented routine cognitive impairment screening by a cardiology nursing team using the Mini‐Cog at the Cleveland Clinic . Although the nurses received some training on using the standardized format, an internal review of our data showed an approximately 18% error rate in Mini‐Cog scoring (unpublished data).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%