Dyke Swarms:Keys for Geodynamic Interpretation 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12496-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineralogical Control on Rheological Inversion of a Suite of Deformed Mafic Dykes from Parts of the Chottanagpur Granite Gneiss Complex of Eastern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPMA monazite dating of felsic orthogneiss and pelitic (khondalite) rock enclaves from the northeastern CGGC region was shown to be ~1,100–930 Ma as an age of metamorphism (Chatterjee et al, 2008, 2010; Sanyal, Sengupta, & Goswami, 2007). (d) Finally, the M 4 metamorphic event is referred to as retrograde metamorphism, where the granulitic rocks were retrograded to the amphibolite facies condition around ~870–780 Ma (Chatterjee, 2018; Mukherjee, Dey, Sanyal, & Sengupta, 2018; Ray, Sanyal, & Sengupta, 2011; Sanyal & Sengupta, 2012). In contrast, monazite dating provided a high‐pressure metamorphic event that occurred at ~880–830 Ma (Chatterjee et al, 2010), and also regional metamorphism within the Dumka‐Jamua‐Ghormara sector was recorded around ~850–780 Ma (Sanyal et al, 2007).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPMA monazite dating of felsic orthogneiss and pelitic (khondalite) rock enclaves from the northeastern CGGC region was shown to be ~1,100–930 Ma as an age of metamorphism (Chatterjee et al, 2008, 2010; Sanyal, Sengupta, & Goswami, 2007). (d) Finally, the M 4 metamorphic event is referred to as retrograde metamorphism, where the granulitic rocks were retrograded to the amphibolite facies condition around ~870–780 Ma (Chatterjee, 2018; Mukherjee, Dey, Sanyal, & Sengupta, 2018; Ray, Sanyal, & Sengupta, 2011; Sanyal & Sengupta, 2012). In contrast, monazite dating provided a high‐pressure metamorphic event that occurred at ~880–830 Ma (Chatterjee et al, 2010), and also regional metamorphism within the Dumka‐Jamua‐Ghormara sector was recorded around ~850–780 Ma (Sanyal et al, 2007).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channelised fluid flow of these elements may control the metamorphic reactions which in turn may cause significant change in the rock property (Connolly 2005). The mechanism for this channelised fluid flux at depth has been long debated; many views were discussed by different workers (Watson and Brenan 1987;Oliver 1996;Lewis et al 1998;Jamtveit et al 2000;Holness and Watt 2001;Nakamura and Watson 2001;Kostenko et al 2002;Iyer et al 2008;Ray et al 2010). One such mechanism is associated with the volume changes (negative or positive changes) during metamorphic reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%