“…(1983) demonstrated that hindlimb muscle stretch did not activate afferents that responded to noxious stimuli, at least in the cat, and the vast majority ( i.e ., >86%) of the muscle afferents that respond to rat hindlimb muscle stretch also respond to hindlimb muscle contraction (Stone, Copp, McCord, & Kaufman, 2015b). Moreover, studies that successfully identify a mechanism that contributes to the generation of the pressor response evoked during rat hindlimb muscle stretch have also found that the same mechanism contributes to the generation of the pressor response evoked during hindlimb muscle contraction (Copp et al., 2016a, b; Downey, Mizuno, Mitchell, Vongpatanasin, & Smith, 2017; Kim & Kaufman, 2019; Leal et al., 2011; McCord, Tsuchimochi, Yamauchi, Leal, & Kaufman, 2011; Nakamoto & Matsukawa, 2008; Schiller et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2005; Smith, Mammen, Mitchell, & Garry, 2003; Tsuchimochi, Yamauchi, McCord, & Kaufman, 2011; Wang, Wang, Patel, Rozanski, & Zucker, 2013; Yamauchi, Stone, Stocker, & Kaufman, 2012). Third, baseline MAP was significantly reduced following EP4‐R blockade in HF‐rEF rats and there was a trend ( P = 0.057) towards a reduction in SHAM rats.…”