2008
DOI: 10.1134/s1064229308070065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineralization of organic matter and the carbon sequestration capacity of zonal soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Romanovskaja [31] show that the average loss of SOC from the abandoned arable land reached 0.46 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 , but the increase of SOC storages after seven years was expected. The great SOC stocks losses in the first years after a change from forest to arable land use are also reported by other researchers [5,32]. One possible reason may be the greater share of potentially mineralizable SOM in forest soils.…”
Section: Management Of Socsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of Romanovskaja [31] show that the average loss of SOC from the abandoned arable land reached 0.46 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 , but the increase of SOC storages after seven years was expected. The great SOC stocks losses in the first years after a change from forest to arable land use are also reported by other researchers [5,32]. One possible reason may be the greater share of potentially mineralizable SOM in forest soils.…”
Section: Management Of Socsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…One possible reason may be the greater share of potentially mineralizable SOM in forest soils. According to Semenov et al [32] the share of easily mineralizable SOM in sod-podzolic forest and arable soils forms, respectively, 6.0% and 3.2% of total SOM.…”
Section: Management Of Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of Romanovskaya (2006) show that the average loss of SOC from abandoned arable land reaches 0.46 Mg C ha ' yr ', but an increase in SOC storage after a couple of years can be expected. Great SOC stock losses in the first years after a change from forest to arable land use are also reported by other researchers (Percival et al, 2000;Semenov et al, 2008). One of the possible reasons is the greater share of potentially mineralizable organic matter in forest soils.…”
Section: Annual Fluxes Of Socsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Soil management practices had a statistically significant influence on the carbon sequestration capacities in the size fractions of WSA (Šimanský 2013b). Semenov et al (2008) showed that the CSC values in arable soil are higher than in the soils of natural ecosystems. Therefore, from the point of view of carbon sequestration, such methods of management (for example the application of organic fertilizers and crop residues, minimal tillage or no-tillage, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%