2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineralization and fragmentation rates of bark attached to logs in a northern boreal forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decomposition rate of bark attached to logs determined in this study is within the range reported for the decomposition rates of stumps (Shorohova et al 2012) and log bark (Shorohova and Kapitsa 2014a) in European boreal forests. The much higher decomposition rates of bark compared to wood may be one of the reasons that our estimates of decomposition rates for whole CWD pieces were in the upper limit of the regional ranges for CWD decomposition rates.…”
Section: Barksupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decomposition rate of bark attached to logs determined in this study is within the range reported for the decomposition rates of stumps (Shorohova et al 2012) and log bark (Shorohova and Kapitsa 2014a) in European boreal forests. The much higher decomposition rates of bark compared to wood may be one of the reasons that our estimates of decomposition rates for whole CWD pieces were in the upper limit of the regional ranges for CWD decomposition rates.…”
Section: Barksupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result can lead to an assumption of higher activity of bark-boring insects under more favorable site conditions compared to poor conditions. In wet forests in Komi sites, bark cover of coniferous trees slowly decreases during decomposition (Shorohova and Kapitsa 2014a). In this study, when Komi sites are combined with more well-drained CF and partly VF1 sites, many trees have already been affected by bark beetles before death.…”
Section: Barkmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In this red pine forest, the CWD k value of 0.0968 at the stand level was within the range of 0.0040-0.1570 from subtropical to boreal pine forests [25,26,[47][48][49][50][51]. This relatively high value appears to be reasonable for our temperate pine forest, which had relatively higher mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation under the Asian monsoon climate.…”
Section: Decomposition Of Fine Litterfall and Cwdmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In decomposition studies, wood and bark are often treated as one substrate (Dossa et al, 2018; Harmon et al, 1986; Weedon et al, 2009), though there are a growing number of studies that consider bark and wood decomposition separately (Dossa, Paudel, Cao, Schaefer, & Harrison, 2016; Dossa et al, 2018; Shorohova & Kapitsa, 2014; Ulyshen, Müller, & Seibold, 2016). Because bark and wood differ in the characteristics that influence decomposition, separating bark and wood decomposition is an easy and potentially revealing way to reduce unexplained variation in wood decomposition and to understand the effect of substrate composition on microbial communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%