2002
DOI: 10.1071/sr01003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineralisation of organic matter in intact versus sieved/refilled soil cores

Abstract: In a 6-month laboratory incubation study, we compared the net C and N mineralisation of the soil organic matter (SOM) of 3 pasture soils and the mineralisation of glucose-C in intact versus sieved/refilled soil cores. The main questions were whether the net C and N mineralisation differed between intact and sieved/refilled soil cores after a conditioning period of 4 weeks, and how much the C and N mineralisation of SOM differed among the similarly managed pasture soils. Apart from the net nitro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, disturbance of the soil resulted both in lower and higher C mineralization rates, while most other studies found higher C mineralization rates after disturbance of the soil (Balesdent et al 2000;Stenger et al 2002). It has to be mentioned that in these experiments reported in literature the soil was disturbed by sieving, which is far more extreme than the disturbance in our experiment and than an intensive tillage operation in the field.…”
Section: Carbon Mineralization Ratecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Surprisingly, disturbance of the soil resulted both in lower and higher C mineralization rates, while most other studies found higher C mineralization rates after disturbance of the soil (Balesdent et al 2000;Stenger et al 2002). It has to be mentioned that in these experiments reported in literature the soil was disturbed by sieving, which is far more extreme than the disturbance in our experiment and than an intensive tillage operation in the field.…”
Section: Carbon Mineralization Ratecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Including microscale heterogeneities in the kinetics of SOM models is recognized as a much needed advancement in the field (Manzoni and Porporato, 2009;Sierra and Muller, 2015;Wieder et al, 2015), though only a few attempts have been made in this direction (e.g., Ebrahimi and Or, 2016;Van Oijen et al, 2017). In contrast, there are several examples of upscaling schemes for chemical reaction networks (Tang andRiley, 2013, 2017). The challenge is therefore to develop spatially upscaled models that describe SOM decomposition at the macroscale while taking into account the microscale heterogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sieving of soil might (1) reduce microbial activity because of physical destruction of populations and substrate, or (2) enhance growth of the microbial biomass because of increased resource availability and, thus, also increase N immobilisation. Stenger et al 15. did not observe differences in changes in microbial biomass during the experiment between intact and sieved soil cores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Whereas Kristensen et al 23. did not find an effect of sieving of the soil on net N mineralisation, Stenger et al 15. reported lower cumulative net N mineralisation of sieved than of intact soil cores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation