2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2140/aa7bfa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineral inversion for element capture spectroscopy logging based on optimization theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the GLT continuously records down a borehole and provides an in‐situ method for estimating mineralogical composition (e.g., Hertzog & Plasek, 1979; Hertzog, 1980; Herron, 1986; Hertzog et al., 1989; Pratson et al., 1992). Various approaches have been attempted to improve the accuracy of converting elemental measurements into quantitative estimates of mineralogy (e.g., Freedman et al., 2015; Harvey et al., 1990, 1992; Herron & Herron, 1996; Lofts et al., 1995; Zhao et al., 2017). To date, some modern GLTs newly developed provide accurate in‐situ mineralogical characterization for conventional and unconventional reservoirs (e.g., Pemper et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the GLT continuously records down a borehole and provides an in‐situ method for estimating mineralogical composition (e.g., Hertzog & Plasek, 1979; Hertzog, 1980; Herron, 1986; Hertzog et al., 1989; Pratson et al., 1992). Various approaches have been attempted to improve the accuracy of converting elemental measurements into quantitative estimates of mineralogy (e.g., Freedman et al., 2015; Harvey et al., 1990, 1992; Herron & Herron, 1996; Lofts et al., 1995; Zhao et al., 2017). To date, some modern GLTs newly developed provide accurate in‐situ mineralogical characterization for conventional and unconventional reservoirs (e.g., Pemper et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A traditional approach, called by some authors a probabilistic model, consists of defining a system of equations in which the input values corresponding to each well log are approximated by combining the individual responses of the different components – minerals and fluids – constituents of formation considered in the model, as a function of their respective volume fractions (Collett et al., 2011; El‐Bagoury, 2020; Mitchell & Nelson, 1988; Stadtmuller et al., 2018). Another widely used approach, here called the direct model, consists of calculating the mineral fractions exclusively from the concentrations of chemical elements in the rock matrix acquired by the geochemical tool (Anderson et al., 1988; Flaum & Pirie, 1981; Herron et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2017). A third class, called the machine learning model, was recently introduced where mineral models are created through trained artificial intelligence algorithms using experimental chemical and mineral composition analysis in rock samples and applied to geochemical logs (de Oliveira et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative elemental yields of the formation are calculated using the Elemental Capture Spectroscopy (ECS) tool. Calcium (Ca), silicon (Si), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), sulfur (S), titanium (Ti), and gadolinium (Gd) are among the elemental yields determined from ECS spectra, with hydrogen providing a measure of the pore space and borehole fluids but otherwise being ignored in the mineralogy determination [4].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%