“…Several studies suggest, conversely, that ALS patients' QoL is independent of physical impairment (Simmons et al, 2000; Palmieri et al, 2010b; Pagnini, 2013), a phenomenon known as “disability paradox” (Carr and Higginson, 2001), although this relationship is still unclear and motor disability or ALS physical consequences are likely to play a crucial role in determining QoL (Ganzini et al, 1999; Lo Coco et al, 2005). QoL has also been negatively associated to psychological variables such as suffering, sense of burden and hopelessness and positively related mainly to spirituality (McLeod and Clarke, 2007; Pagnini et al, 2011), caregiver relations (Chiò et al, 2004), and mindful attitude (i.e., not evaluating a situation or a context only through previous categorizations, but actively making new distinctions by assuming multiple viewpoints and perspectives; Pagnini et al, 2014a). Fegg et al (2005) and Roach et al (2009), highlight a usually undervalued viewpoint, i.e., personality and personal attitudes strongly modulate and shape in a unique manner the possible reactions to ALS.…”