2009
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindfulness in Thailand and the United States: a case of apples versus oranges?

Abstract: The study and practice of mindfulness is rapidly expanding in Western psychology. Recently developed self-report measures of mindfulness were derived from Western operationalizations and cross-cultural validation of many of these measures is lacking, particularly in Buddhist cultures. Therefore, this study examined the measurement equivalence of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) and Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) among Thai (n=385) and American (n=365) college students. Multigroup c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous studies have demonstrated the validity of translated scales, for example, the validity of MAAS and SCS scales for Greek-speaking populations [24]. In contrast, Christopher, Charoensuk, Gilbert, Neary, and Pearce [8] suggested that mindfulness cannot be properly operationalized in the MAAS at least for Buddhist cultures. As far as the Russian versions of the instruments used in this study are concerned, Ivanova et al [13] validated the HSQ but we were unable to locate any other empirical studies that used the Russian translation of the HSQ or the Russian MAAS and SCS.…”
Section: Self-defeating Humormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some previous studies have demonstrated the validity of translated scales, for example, the validity of MAAS and SCS scales for Greek-speaking populations [24]. In contrast, Christopher, Charoensuk, Gilbert, Neary, and Pearce [8] suggested that mindfulness cannot be properly operationalized in the MAAS at least for Buddhist cultures. As far as the Russian versions of the instruments used in this study are concerned, Ivanova et al [13] validated the HSQ but we were unable to locate any other empirical studies that used the Russian translation of the HSQ or the Russian MAAS and SCS.…”
Section: Self-defeating Humormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar issues, if somewhat less frivolous, have arisen in other research as well. Another study of the MAAS and KIMS across a Thai population (where Buddhist beliefs are predominant) and US sample (where Buddhist beliefs are in 230 PAUL GROSSMAN AND NICHOLAS T. VAN DAM the minority) found no overall differences on the MAAS (even though rates of meditation in the two groups were substantially different); also the KIMS exhibited inconsistent relationships among its items across the groups (Christopher et al 2009). Such findings bring into question what psychologists are actually measuring with these questionnaires and whether there is adequate scientific support for their continued use, if characterized as measures of mindfulness.…”
Section: Paul Grossman and Nicholas T Van Dammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…formally practice meditation (Christopher, Charoensuk, Gilbert, Neary, & Pearce, 2009). The practice of mindfulness in Thailand is embedded within a specific religio-cultural context and is coupled with the systematic teaching of Buddhist philosophy.…”
Section: Chapter Fivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic replication of this study will be conducted in Australia so that the findings from the two studies can be compared. This is important given that mindfulness in psychotherapy requires an understanding of the cultural context from which it originated (Christopher, Charoensuk, Gilbert, & Neary, 2009). The following hypotheses were proposed.…”
Section: Research Aims and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation