2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Despite widespread scientific and popular interest in mindfulness-based interventions, questions regarding the empirical status of these treatments remain. We sought to examine the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for clinical populations on disorder-specific symptoms. To address the question of relative efficacy, we coded the strength of the comparison group into five categories: no treatment, minimal treatment, non-specific active control, specific active control, and evidence-based treatment. A t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
341
2
20

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 792 publications
(423 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
18
341
2
20
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific active control conditions (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy) included comparisons that were based on actual therapies (i.e., not "placebo" conditions that were not intended to be therapeutic) and included specific treatment ingredients and mechanisms of change (Wampold & Imel, 2015;Wampold et al, 1997). The decision to code using this scheme was made to minimize the number of comparisons being tested, to increase the number of studies (and statistical power) available for a given comparison, and based on evidence that whether a comparison group represents a specific active control condition significantly influences the relative efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (Goldberg et al, 2018;Goyal et al, 2014). The comparison with other active therapies has been consistently highlighted as a key test of the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (Davidson & Kaszniak, 2015;Goldberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific active control conditions (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy) included comparisons that were based on actual therapies (i.e., not "placebo" conditions that were not intended to be therapeutic) and included specific treatment ingredients and mechanisms of change (Wampold & Imel, 2015;Wampold et al, 1997). The decision to code using this scheme was made to minimize the number of comparisons being tested, to increase the number of studies (and statistical power) available for a given comparison, and based on evidence that whether a comparison group represents a specific active control condition significantly influences the relative efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (Goldberg et al, 2018;Goyal et al, 2014). The comparison with other active therapies has been consistently highlighted as a key test of the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions (Davidson & Kaszniak, 2015;Goldberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mindfulness-based interventions, such as a combination of mindfulness training and psychoeducation program, have become increasingly popular in recent years, and they have been found to be more effective on improving psychological well-being, when compared to mindfulness and/or meditation training alone (8). There is a growing body of evidence from meta-analyses highlighting the significant effects of mindfulnessbased interventions on psychological well-being and physical health outcomes of individuals diagnosed with cancer (9), chronic pain (10), psychiatric disorders (11), as well as healthy individuals (12). In a recent meta-analysis of ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mindfulness-and acceptance-based interventions in adults with psychotic disorders, group format mindfulness-based interventions showed larger therapeutic effects (Hedge's g = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.18-0.75) than individualbased Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (g = 0.08, 95% CI: −0.23 to 0.38) (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Siegel (2007), mindfulness can be a form of self-attunement that could facilitate the attunement to others. There is increasing evidence that mindfulness training counteracts psychological distress (Goldberg et al, 2018), and that these effects are due to proposed mechanisms of action in mindfulness-based interventions (Gu, Strauss, Bond, & Cavanagh, 2015). Mindfulness training may thus constitute a form of self-care for clinicians that enables them to deal with stressors and emotional reactions in an adaptive manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%