2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for headache pain: An evaluation of the long-term maintenance of effects

Abstract: Please cite this article as: Day Melissa A, Thorn Beverly E.Mindfulnessbased cognitive therapy for headache pain: An evaluation of the longterm maintenance of effects.Complementary Therapies in Medicine http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.ctim.2017.06.009 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof befor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, and despite the aforementioned limitations, findings are consistent with the ones of other mindfulness-and acceptancebased interventions follow-up studies for medical conditions such as headache pain, endometriosis, recurrent depression, and diabetes (Day & Thorn, 2017;Hansen, Kesmodel, Kold, & Forman, 2017;Meadows et al, 2014;van Son et al, 2014). Furthermore, it is also worth noting the low attrition rate in the group who completed the MBPI over the course of the 7-year period, bearing in mind that this is a quite long period and that the main aim of the study was to explore whether the MBPI results were maintained over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In conclusion, and despite the aforementioned limitations, findings are consistent with the ones of other mindfulness-and acceptancebased interventions follow-up studies for medical conditions such as headache pain, endometriosis, recurrent depression, and diabetes (Day & Thorn, 2017;Hansen, Kesmodel, Kold, & Forman, 2017;Meadows et al, 2014;van Son et al, 2014). Furthermore, it is also worth noting the low attrition rate in the group who completed the MBPI over the course of the 7-year period, bearing in mind that this is a quite long period and that the main aim of the study was to explore whether the MBPI results were maintained over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Earlier research with MBCT for depression treatment and relapse prevention defined the treatment targets of mindfulness meditation skills and disease-related cognitions and refined the classic 8-week, group delivery intervention protocol. 31,34 This treatment protocol was further refined for migraine (MBCT for Migraine; MBCT-M) in an individual format for the current trial. 31,34 This treatment protocol was further refined for migraine (MBCT for Migraine; MBCT-M) in an individual format for the current trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,33 The two-armed trial in people with primary headache disorders tailored the protocol for headache and demonstrated proof-of-concept in this population. 31,34 This treatment protocol was further refined for migraine (MBCT for Migraine; MBCT-M) in an individual format for the current trial. 35 The current Phase 2b study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MBCT-M to reduce migraine-related disability in people with migraine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the durability of the desired effect, though promising and long lasting results have been demonstrated in different patient populations. 35,36 It should also be noted that the studies by Voskuijl and Ring and Beks et al did not describe any adjustment of statistical inference in their bivariate analysis of multiple comparisons. Third, it should be noted that all studies included were performed in the same outpatient office by the same research group, which potentially is a source for shared bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%