2002
DOI: 10.1080/13504620220145401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?

Abstract: Fliegenschnee and Schelakovsky (1998) who were in uenced by Fietkau and Kessel (1981).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

181
4,201
21
202

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,981 publications
(5,115 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
181
4,201
21
202
Order By: Relevance
“…Pro-environmental behavior encompasses various types of actions that are intended to minimize the individual's negative impact on the environment (e.g., minimize energy consumption, reduce waste production; Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002;Steg & Vlek, 2009). Pro-environmental actions are prosocial by nature insofar as they typically do no entail direct benefits for the acting individual but rather serve long-term collective interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pro-environmental behavior encompasses various types of actions that are intended to minimize the individual's negative impact on the environment (e.g., minimize energy consumption, reduce waste production; Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002;Steg & Vlek, 2009). Pro-environmental actions are prosocial by nature insofar as they typically do no entail direct benefits for the acting individual but rather serve long-term collective interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pro-environmental actions are prosocial by nature insofar as they typically do no entail direct benefits for the acting individual but rather serve long-term collective interests. In the environmental psychology literature, several models have therefore integrated proenvironmental behavior into the general framework of prosocial behavior (Bamberg & Möser, 2007;Kaiser & Byrka, 2011;Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002;Stern, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of actual behavior in the real world are multiple and complex. Previous research has established, however, that behavioral intention provides an imperfect but reasonable proxy for actual behavior (Kim & Hunter, 1993;Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002;O'Keefe, 2002;Wallace et al, 2005). However, that we are measuring the behavioral intentions is an important limitation that should encourage caution in interpretation of results (see the discussion of this issue below).…”
Section: Testing the Communicative Efficacy Of The Sfc And The Hfrmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In 1977 Schwartz developed a model of altruism which assumed that altruistic behavior will increase when a person becomes aware of another's suffering and, at the same time, feels responsibility for this suffering (Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002). Schwartz explained behavior in terms of an interrelationship between four major constructs: awareness of consequences, ascription of responsibility, social norms and personal norms.…”
Section: Theory Of Waste Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%