2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap

Abstract: Detections of gravitational waves are now starting to probe the mass distribution of stellar mass black holes (BHs). Robust predictions from stellar models are needed to interpret these. Theory predicts the existence of a gap in the BH mass distribution because of pair-instability supernovae. The maximum BH mass below the gap is the result of pulsational mass loss. We evolve massive helium stars through their late hydrodynamical phases of evolution using the open-source MESA stellar evolution code. We find tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
409
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
17
409
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, a larger number of dynamical mergers reduces the number of light remnant BHs, M M 20 40 rem -  , making it harder to match observations and models in the M rem -a rem plane. (Belczynski et al 2016a;Woosley 2017Woosley , 2019Giacobbo et al 2018;Marchant et al 2019;Stevenson et al 2019;Renzo et al 2020), by stellar rotation (Mapelli et al 2020), by uncertainty on nuclear reaction rates (Farmer et al 2019), and by the collapse of a residual hydrogen envelope (Mapelli et al 2020). As a result, M BHmax might be as low as ∼40-45 M  (Belczynski et al 2016b) or as high as ∼65 M  (Giacobbo et al 2018).…”
Section: Impact Of the Formation Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, a larger number of dynamical mergers reduces the number of light remnant BHs, M M 20 40 rem -  , making it harder to match observations and models in the M rem -a rem plane. (Belczynski et al 2016a;Woosley 2017Woosley , 2019Giacobbo et al 2018;Marchant et al 2019;Stevenson et al 2019;Renzo et al 2020), by stellar rotation (Mapelli et al 2020), by uncertainty on nuclear reaction rates (Farmer et al 2019), and by the collapse of a residual hydrogen envelope (Mapelli et al 2020). As a result, M BHmax might be as low as ∼40-45 M  (Belczynski et al 2016b) or as high as ∼65 M  (Giacobbo et al 2018).…”
Section: Impact Of the Formation Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, significant work is conducted to study what can modify the predicted location of this mass gap, including uncertainties in nuclear reaction rates (Takahashi 2018;Farmer et al 2019), convection (Renzo et al 2020), the presence of a massive hydrogen envelope at iron-core collapse (Di Carlo et al 2019), and accretion after BH formation (van Son et al 2020). Regarding rotation, work has been done to study how it affects the evolution of a star prior to a PPISN or PISN (Chatzopoulos et al 2013;Mapelli et al 2020), but there is still a large uncertainty on how rotation affects the actual hydrodynamics of these events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, many uncertain or unknown parameters enter in the modeling of internal processes in stars (poorly known nuclear reaction rates, modeling of mixing processes, wind mass loss rates, etc.). Exploring the parameter space for single star evolution is a challenging task still being actively pursued (e.g., Woosley, 2017;Renzo et al, 2017;Sukhbold et al, 2018;Woosley, 2019;Farmer et al, 2019, for recent studies of single massive stars). When considering the evolution of two stars born together in a binary, i.e., the standard for massive stars, the number of dimensions of the parameter space increases very rapidly: not only the evolution of a massive binary system depends on the two initial masses of the stars, but also their initial orbital period and, possibly, eccentricity.…”
Section: Population Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%