2016
DOI: 10.4148/2373-0994.1002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the Gap: Student Researchers Use Secondary Data to Explore Disparities in STEM Education

Abstract: Large data sets offer opportunities for graduate students to become involved in meaningful research, but also comes with a unique set of challenges. This paper seeks to examine that relationship through utilizing the High School Longitudinal Study 2009 -representative of US ninth graders in 2009 (n = 21,444) -to examine a set of research questions about STEM interest and preparation amongst secondary students. Student researchers identified gaps in plans and outcomes with regards to race, gender, exceptionalit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This calls for a serious consideration by the Ministry of Education in order to achieve the ratio of 60:40 in the number of students enrolled in the science stream and arts stream. Another growing concern in regard to the STEM performance is the high competition in the workforce (Bean, Gnadt, Maupin, White, & Anderson, 2016;Ling, Lee & Jiebo, 2016). Thus, the move to solidify English is a propitious one but there are some hindrances that need be overcome when making English the instructional medium in the teaching and learning of content subjects, specifically Mathematics and Science.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for a serious consideration by the Ministry of Education in order to achieve the ratio of 60:40 in the number of students enrolled in the science stream and arts stream. Another growing concern in regard to the STEM performance is the high competition in the workforce (Bean, Gnadt, Maupin, White, & Anderson, 2016;Ling, Lee & Jiebo, 2016). Thus, the move to solidify English is a propitious one but there are some hindrances that need be overcome when making English the instructional medium in the teaching and learning of content subjects, specifically Mathematics and Science.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this inclusion criterion was applied, our analytic sample dropped from 61 to 50 studies (see Figure 1). For example, we excluded studies by Bean et al (2016), Whalen and Shelly (2010), Lord et al (2011), Kokkelenberg and Sinha (2010), Hill (2017), Fenske et al (2000), Riegle-Crumb et al (2012), and Green and Sanderson (2018) because their findings applied to the general population rather than a subgroup of minoritized populations. The final analytic sample on which our synthesis is based includes 37 quantitative studies, 2 mixed methods, and 11 qualitative studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature reports evidence that although many RMS express a strong preference for and interest in STEM fields (Baird et al, 2018; Bean et al, 2016; Flynn, 2016; Lichtenberger & George-Jackson, 2013; Ma, 2009), they are less likely to graduate with STEM majors (Ma, 2009). This outcome is due, in part, to Black and Latinx students’ lower high school graduation and college enrollment rates compared to Whites and Asian.…”
Section: Background: Racial Gaps In Stem College and Workforce Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sources of items and scales for the Grade 12 Student Survey included the National Center for Education Statistics’ High School Longitudinal Study, the Consortium for Chicago School Research's Biennial Chicago Public School Student Survey, and surveys used in SRI's Program Evaluation of the Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers Program and its Evaluation of the Texas High School Project (THSP). Survey scales from these instruments have demonstrated predictive validity with respect to variables such as science self‐efficacy (Bean, Gnadt, Maupin, White, & Andersen, ) and high school graduation rates (Allensworth, Healey, Gwynne, & Crespin, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%