2009
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind the gap revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While, we may heed the words of Arie Rip and Alfred Nordmann (Nordmann and Rip, 2009) in focusing on the inequities and issues associated with practical nanotechnology now without getting too drawn into future, unknowable ethics, it also useful to note the hyperreality of nanotechnology discourses (esoteric and exoteric) are constructed and described as the future here and now, and thus have 'clear and present dangers'. 43…”
Section: The Construction Of Utopias and Dystopiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While, we may heed the words of Arie Rip and Alfred Nordmann (Nordmann and Rip, 2009) in focusing on the inequities and issues associated with practical nanotechnology now without getting too drawn into future, unknowable ethics, it also useful to note the hyperreality of nanotechnology discourses (esoteric and exoteric) are constructed and described as the future here and now, and thus have 'clear and present dangers'. 43…”
Section: The Construction Of Utopias and Dystopiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, these fiction-orientated arenas may deal most prominently with some sense of risk or concern, such as the 'grey goo' scenario. Rather than considering such concerns as outlandish and outside the terms of debate, understanding media practices of the 'cultures of nanotechnology' might focus away from traditional 'risk assessment' and instrumentalist ideas of public concerns about technology and bring public participation closer to the sites of innovation where publics feel they have a voice in the eventual policy and regulatory outcome.While, we may heed the words of Arie Rip and Alfred Nordmann (Nordmann and Rip, 2009) in focusing on the inequities and issues associated with practical nanotechnology now without getting too drawn into future, unknowable ethics, it also useful to note the hyperreality of nanotechnology discourses (esoteric and exoteric) are constructed and described as the future here and now, and thus have 'clear and present dangers'. 43…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing debates surrounding ethical issues in nanomedicine are consequent of the past technologies such as biotechnology and information technology [1]. Debates also exist over whether nanomedicine has any unique ethical issues or the ethical issues of past technologies apply to nanoscience [2]. Researchers have widely written about probable ethical scenarios that might coincide with the development of nanoscience [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current philosophers of technology argue in favour of addressing the technical details of a technology in order to adequately address the associated ethical Introduction issues [Verbeek , 2011;Nordmann and Rip, 2009;Brey , 2012]. So what is the technology that I am talking about?…”
Section: Creating a Framework For Evaluating Care Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By presenting current robot capabilities and prototypes, the aim is two-fold: 1. to prepare the reader for evaluations of real world robots rather than speculative robots [Smits et al, 1995;Nordmann and Rip, 2009] and, 2. to educate the reader on the technical capacities of a care robot as a pre-requisite for plausible evaluations [Swierstra and Rip, 2007;Lucivero et al, 2011]. I outline what a care robot is, the functions it serves, and the technical capabilities a care robot may posses now and in the foresee- University of Twente).…”
Section: Care Robots and Robot Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%