Mind the Gap in Mindfulness Research: A Comparative Account of the Leading Schools of Thought

Abstract

The literature on mindfulness has been dominated by the two leading schools of thought: one advanced by Langer and her colleagues the other developed by Kabat-Zinn and his associates. Curiously, the two strands of research have been running in parallel lines for more than 30 years, scarcely addressing each others' work, and with hardly any attempt to clarify the relationship between them. In view of this gap, this paper aims to systematically compare and contrast the two lines of research.The comparison between the two schools of thought suggests that while there are some similarities in their definitions of mindfulness, they differ in several core aspects: their philosophies, the components of their constructs, their goals, their theoretical scope, their measurement tools, their conceptual focus, their target audiences, the interventions they employ, the mechanisms underlying these interventions, and the outcomes of their interventions. However, the analysis also revealed that self-regulation is a core mechanism in both perspectives, which seems to mediate the impact of their interventions.In view of the differences between the two strands of research, we propose that they would be given different titles that capture their prime features. We suggest 'creativemindfulness' for Langer and her colleagues' scholarship, and 'meditative-mindfulness' for Kabat-Zinn and his associates' scholarly work.

Putting the ‘app’ in Happiness: A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Smartphone-Based Mindfulness Intervention to Enhance Wellbeing

“…Mindfulness is a practice of non-judgmental awareness of present moment experiences (Kabat-Zinn, 2005; see also Hart, Ivtzan, & Hart, 2013) that is inherently linked to greater wellbeing. There is a wealth of scientific literature spanning more than three decades demonstrating the beneficial impact mindfulness meditation has on health, wellbeing and psychological functioning in both clinical and non-clinical populations (for reviews see Keng, Smoski & Robins, 2011;Shapiro & Carlson, 2009;Baer, 2003;Dillbeck & Orme-Johnson, 1987).…”

A study investigating the effects of Mindfulness-Based Strengths Practice (MBSP) on wellbeing

“…Either of these two elements is capable of being heightened individually (Hart, Ivtzan, & Hart, 2013). However, despite theoretical and conceptual overlap , these drivers of human flourishing (or eudaimonic wellbeing) have only ever been applied separately.…”

Integrating Mindfulness into Positive Psychology: a Randomised Controlled Trial of an Online Positive Mindfulness Program

“…This state of mind is an invitation for the practitioner to attend the full range of internal and external experiences with a non-judgemental stance (Hart, Ivtzan, & Hart, 2013). Studies have shown that mindfulness promotes both hedonic (Brown & Cordon, 2009) and eudaimonic wellbeing (Brown, Ryan, & Creswell, 2007).…”