2018
DOI: 10.21070/jees.v3i2.1498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind Mapping vs Semantic Mapping: Which Technique Gives EFL Learners more Benefits in Reading Comprehension?

Abstract: This research aimed at comparing mind mapping technique and semantic mapping technique in teaching reading comprehension. It was intended to find out which technique (mind mapping or semantic mapping) was more effective to strengthen the reading comprehension and which technique was more interesting in learning process to the second graders of SMAN 5 Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. It was an experimental research. There are two classes taken as sample, XI IPA1as experimental 1 class, and XI IPA2 as experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mind maps can stimulate associative and divergent thinking, fully engaging different parts of the brain to work together, thus benefitting the training of resident physicians [12] . Previous studies have reported positive impacts of mind map-based teaching on students' learning outcomes, including improvement in memory recall, reading comprehension, creative and critical thinking abilities, and overall learning performance [13][14][15][16] . In this study, the observation group showed significantly higher scores in the Mini-CEX assessment, theoretical exam results, skill assessments, and overall satisfaction compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mind maps can stimulate associative and divergent thinking, fully engaging different parts of the brain to work together, thus benefitting the training of resident physicians [12] . Previous studies have reported positive impacts of mind map-based teaching on students' learning outcomes, including improvement in memory recall, reading comprehension, creative and critical thinking abilities, and overall learning performance [13][14][15][16] . In this study, the observation group showed significantly higher scores in the Mini-CEX assessment, theoretical exam results, skill assessments, and overall satisfaction compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite the unavailability of such above-mentioned studies in literature, there are numerous studies which utilise mind mapping to promote sub-dimensions of school readiness skills in parallel with the finding of the research. These researches can be categorised as follows: the contribution of mind mapping to the science learning of children (Balim, 2013;Evrekli & Balim, 2010;Gagic, Skuban, Radulovic, Stojanovic, & Gajic, 2019;Gomleksiz & Fidan, 2013), the contribution of mind mapping to the learning of social sciences (Parikh, 2016), the contribution of mind mapping to mathematical learning (Brinkmann, 2003;Mardiyah et al, 2018), the contribution of mind mapping to reading skills (Inayah, & Argawati, 2019;Karolina, 2019;Khatimah, & Rachman, 2018), the contribution of mind mapping to writing skills (Dianto & Basuni, 2015;Inayah, & Argawati, 2019;Lastari & Hadi, 2018;Sukma, & Ria, 2018;), the contribution of mind mapping to listening and language development (Koster, Wilt, Kruistum, & Veen, 2017) and the contribution of mind mapping to group studies (Luke, Lloyd, Boyd, & Den Exter, 2014). This study contains similar research findings which indicate that mathematical, science, sound, line, maze, mental-language development and social-emotional development addressed as sub-dimensions of school readiness are supported with mind mapping applications.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, numerous skills such as thinking and reasoning, determining possible causes, analysing, caution, memory, coordination, creativity, imagination, reading, writing, visualization, planning and application, and emotions are used simultaneously in mind mapping (Wen-Cheng, Chung-Chieh, & Ying-Chien, 2010). It is seen that studies which target learning with children through the mind mapping method are generally for reading (Inayah, & Argawati, 2019;Karolina, 2019;Khatimah, & Rachman, 2018;) and writing skills (Dianto & Basuni, 2015;Inayah, & Argawati, 2019;Lastari & Hadi, 2018;Sukma & Ria, 2018) in children of older ages. On the other hand, it was found out that mathematical and science skills of children increased with mind mapping applied during the preschool period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activity looks effective to activate their thinking before reading. Khatimah and Rachman (2018) state the mind mapping technique can improve students' reading and writing skills because before reading students are asked to do writing exercises. For instance, in the discussion session, they are asked to draw a branch of the initial topic they discuss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%