2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Min–Max vs. Min–Sum Vehicle Routing: A worst-case analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we agree with the closing remark in Bertazzi et al. () that multiobjective vehicle routing problems with MinMax and MinSum objectives is a promising research area. We intend to consider such combinations of objectives in our continued research.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, we agree with the closing remark in Bertazzi et al. () that multiobjective vehicle routing problems with MinMax and MinSum objectives is a promising research area. We intend to consider such combinations of objectives in our continued research.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, the min-max tree cover that we study is an NP-hard problem (even for k = 2) whereas finding k trees such that their total length is minimized can be done in polynomial time (using the greedy algorithm for finding a minimum cost basis of a matroid). A comparison between min-max vehicle routing models and min-sum vehicle routing models was done by Bertazzi et al [10]. This comparison also motivates by practical applications the study of the min-max versions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This comparison also motivates by practical applications the study of the min-max versions. We refer to [10] for details. In this paper, we consider k to be a parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insights from Bertazzi et al (2015) show that also the objective of minimizing t L may have significantly higher total travel distance than the minimizing total travel distance solution. In fact, the authors prove that in the worst case the ratio of the two solutions total travel distance tends to infinity.…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best route balance solution will be that each vehicle service one customer in each cluster. Total travel distances for each of the best solutions are then: Bertazzi et al (2015) show that also when the balance objective is to minimize t L the worst case is T s ∆ /T s T → Q. However, unless Q = 1, this ratio will never reach Q.…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%