2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-019-1631-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Min–max formulas for nonlocal elliptic operators

Abstract: In this work, we give a characterization of Lipschitz operators on spaces of C 2 (M ) functions (also C 1,1 , C 1,γ , C 1 , C γ ) that obey the global comparison property-i.e. those that preserve the global ordering of input functions at any points where their graphs may touch, often called "elliptic" operators. Here M is a complete Riemannian manifold. In particular, we show that all such operators can be written as a min-max over linear operators that are a combination of drift-diffusion and integro-differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1.7. We note that one subtle improvement of the current work upon our previous one in [29] is that because of a more streamlined proof for the translation invariant case, we were able to establish the non-translation invariant case, Theorem 1.9 (below), without the technical Assumption 1.3. This is purely an artifact of using an approximation scheme in [29] to treat all operators by the same method, and this turns out to have been not essential when one does not want the extra information provided by Theorems 1.11 and 1.14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 1.7. We note that one subtle improvement of the current work upon our previous one in [29] is that because of a more streamlined proof for the translation invariant case, we were able to establish the non-translation invariant case, Theorem 1.9 (below), without the technical Assumption 1.3. This is purely an artifact of using an approximation scheme in [29] to treat all operators by the same method, and this turns out to have been not essential when one does not want the extra information provided by Theorems 1.11 and 1.14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We will review the proof of this result in the context of Euclidean space, where many of the arguments simplify greatly. Moreover, we prove two refinements of the main result from [29] relevant to the Euclidean case, one involving translation invariant operators and one for operators that behave continuously with respect to translation operators. Stated informally, our results are the following: Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations