Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1606.08417
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Min-max formulas for nonlocal elliptic operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will review the proof of this result in the context of Euclidean space, where many of the arguments simplify greatly. Moreover, we prove two refinements of the main result from [29] relevant to the Euclidean case, one involving translation invariant operators and one for operators that behave continuously with respect to translation operators. Stated informally, our results are the following: Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will review the proof of this result in the context of Euclidean space, where many of the arguments simplify greatly. Moreover, we prove two refinements of the main result from [29] relevant to the Euclidean case, one involving translation invariant operators and one for operators that behave continuously with respect to translation operators. Stated informally, our results are the following: Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In our previous work, [29], we showed such a min-max representation in (1.3). The result in [29] in fact dealt with a more general situation where I :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Equations of the form (1.1) arise in stochastic optimal control and stochastic differential games where the operators are the generators of pure jump processes. In a work by one of the authors and Schwab [14] it is proved that (roughly speaking) that the class of operators given by a min-max as in (1.1) is the same as the class of operators satisfying the global comparison property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other motivation of studying regularity for the integro-differential operator I in (1.1) comes from the generality of the operator. Indeed it has been proved that if I maps C 2 functions to C 0 functions and moreover satisfies the degenerate ellipticity assumption then I should have the form in (1.1), see [9,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%