2004
DOI: 10.1080/0020717042000197631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIMO interaction measure and controller structure selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
78
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent references that compile classical results related to the first question can be found in (Conley, 2000), (Salgado and Conley, 2004) and in the references therein. The main drawback of classical interaction measures (RGA, DRGA, NI) is that they do not consider the dynamics of the process, since their either rely only on the frequency response at DC or, when the complete frequency axis is taken into account (as the DRGA does), they lead to results which are hard to analyze and to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent references that compile classical results related to the first question can be found in (Conley, 2000), (Salgado and Conley, 2004) and in the references therein. The main drawback of classical interaction measures (RGA, DRGA, NI) is that they do not consider the dynamics of the process, since their either rely only on the frequency response at DC or, when the complete frequency axis is taken into account (as the DRGA does), they lead to results which are hard to analyze and to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those advantages originate in their simplicity, their connection with classical single-input single-output control and in implementation and tuning issues (Conley, 2000), (Yuz and Goodwin, 2003). Nevertheless, that approach to control system design poses several fundamental questions (Sourlas and Manousiousthakis, 1995), (Goodwin et al, 1999), (Salgado and Conley, 2004). Among those questions are, firstly, how to select those measurements that will be used to generate every plant input, i.e., how to pair inputs and outputs, and secondly, once the pairing has been decided, how to synthesize, if possible, a stabilizing controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second category of the interaction measures is the family of the gramian based methods. A method from this category was first proposed in [11] and further in [12]. In this category, the observability and the controllability gramians are used to form the Participation Matrix (PM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IM considered in this paper is the Participation Matrix (PM) [1], which uses the squared HilbertScmhmidt (HS) norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%