Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016 IEEE 17th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2016.7536746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIMO cellular networks with Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we introduce a mathematical approach for system-level analysis and optimization of densely deployed multiple-antenna cellular networks, where low-energy devices are capable of decoding information data and harvesting power simultaneously. The base stations are assumed to be deployed according to a Poisson point process and tools from stochastic geometry are exploited to quantify the trade-off in terms of information rate and harvested power. It is shown that multiple-antenna transmissio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can conclude that the power splitting ratio must be as large as possible and its fine tuning is of limited interest in the design of ultra-dense SWIPT networks. It is worth remarking that this conclusion is radically different from previous works (see [11]) in which the authors consider values of harvested power below −60dBm. In that case, multi-user interference has a limited role while the optimisation of the power splitting ratio is paramount.…”
Section: ) Swipt Receiver Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can conclude that the power splitting ratio must be as large as possible and its fine tuning is of limited interest in the design of ultra-dense SWIPT networks. It is worth remarking that this conclusion is radically different from previous works (see [11]) in which the authors consider values of harvested power below −60dBm. In that case, multi-user interference has a limited role while the optimisation of the power splitting ratio is paramount.…”
Section: ) Swipt Receiver Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…In this paper, the authors have proposed a tractable mathematical approach for the system-level analysis and optimization of SWIPT-enabled outdoor cellular networks. In [11], a mathematical framework is presented for MIMO SWIPT-enabled outdoor cellular networks. Though the methodology that is presented in both papers is extremely valuable in providing a tool for analysing the performance of stochastic SWIPT-enabled networks, their studies consider an outdoor cellular network that is too sparse to satisfy the constraints on the minimum received power that would enable RF energy harvesting.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to deal with this problem, stochastic geometry (SG) has been introduced as a random and spatial model to analyse the performance of dense networks [12]. A mathematical framework for stochastic geometry analysis of SWIPT systems was originally proposed in [13] and subsequently extended in [14]- [16] for MIMO SWIPT networks. However, all those studies consider outdoor cellular networks and propagation models based on distance-based path-loss functions only, thus failing in describing the correlated structure of the signal blockage due to buildings and walls.…”
Section: A Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ 2 * = σ 2 n + σ 2 c 1−ρ , q * = Q * ρζ , T * = q * +σ 2 * γ+1 and γ = 1/ 2 R * /B − 1 . Eventually, by substituting (7), (13), and (22) into (23), the J-CCDF F c (R * , Q * ) is obtained through the expression [14] F c (R * , Q * ) = K m,n m s=1…”
Section: Rate-energy Trade-off Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%